CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前DeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down116cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.senews@lemmy.worldhardware@lemmy.world
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comCharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.senews@lemmy.worldhardware@lemmy.world
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 个月前Huh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
minus-squarefallowseed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down5·1 个月前doesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
minus-squareCameronDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 个月前Unless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 个月前I guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
Huh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
doesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
Unless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?
I guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.