• TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    “We believe we need to let that diplomacy play out.”

    Is that what we’re calling it now?

  • Patapon Enjoyer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    does anyone know another word for complicit, I’m tired of saying it

    • @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I understand why the first proposal from Russia was rejected, but this one should have been pretty uncontroversial. This is really a WTF moment for US diplomacy.

      • @BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Unfortunately not. If you’ve been paying attention, this aligns pretty well with their behavior in the past.

      • @Faresh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is really a WTF moment for US diplomacy.

        Not really, considering the US’s past actions and decisions, especially regarding Israel.

        • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I think it’s less effective than it could be with the ability to check world powers and their allies with financial incentives among other things.

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        No - they’re why the UN exists.

        The purpose of the UN is to prevent global war. The Security Council veto keeps the UN from taking sides in a military conflict against the interests of a county that can maintain that level of warfare.

        • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Lmao

          The UN was not created to maintain peace. They were the result of a massive conflict. The ability to give financial incentives for peace by restricting powerful nations would make the UN a thousand times more effective.

      • @AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        The US would veto via military action if we couldn’t veto by voting. It’s a bad system, but better than going to war (more than we already do).

  • @NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We are no strangers to genicides so no surprise here. How did Israel, founded by genicide survivers become the ones doing the genicide?! (rhetorical)

    • Spzi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Genocide, uh, finds a way.

      From an evolutionary perspective, the history of life is made from genocides, with survivors riding on top. Everybody’s fighting for their niche.

      Similarly, the abrahamic religions compete for their access to the Holy Land.

      • @NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Yes to

        Genocide finds a way

        But absolutely not to

        life is made from genocides

        Humanity reached its current level because way more cooperation and kindness than war and genicide. We are just predisposed to focusing on the bad things. No one notices someone that does small acts of kindness.

        • Spzi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          True. But if you zoom further out, it becomes genocides again. The rise of humans was only possible for the downfall of other species. The rise of human civilization spelled doom for many others.

          Ok, genocide strictly only applies to other humans. Anyways the core idea remains: For one culture to spread, others have to give way.

          No one notices someone that does small acts of kindness.

          Sad, isn’t it? History books are like a gallery of psychopaths grabbing for more and more power.

      • @LaLiLuLuCo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        There’s also a literal loophole in the regional morality system where once hostages are taken almost everyone is down to start war criming.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    131 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The vote on the Brazilian-drafted text was twice delayed in the past couple of days as the United States tries to broker aid access to Gaza.

    Ambassador Zhang Jun accused the United States of leading council members to believe that the resolution could be adopted after it did not comment or express opposition during negotiations.

    Thomas-Greenfield said the United States was disappointed the draft resolution made no mention of Israel’s rights of self defense and she blamed Hamas for the Gaza humanitarian crisis.

    The draft resolution also urged Israel - without naming it - to rescind its order for civilians and U.N. staff in Gaza to move to the south of the Palestinian enclave and condemns “the terrorist attacks by Hamas.”

    It has vowed to annihilate Hamas after the Islamist militant group killed 1,400 people and seized hostages in an Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

    The draft U.N. resolution condemned all violence and hostilities against civilians and all acts of terrorism and called for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages.


    The original article contains 518 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Annoyed_🦀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    “We are on the ground doing the hard work of diplomacy,” U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, told the 15-member council after the vote. “We believe we need to let that diplomacy play out.”

    “Yes, resolutions are important. And yes, this council must speak out. But the actions we take must be informed by the facts on the ground and support direct diplomacy efforts. That can save lives. The council needs to get this right,” she said.

    US not only want to play hero, they want to play THE hero it seems.

  • @TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I’m not clear on what the action proposed to do. I read both the article and the bot summary. Sort of lost on the jargon I guess. Could anyone explain, perhaps with a quote?

    • @DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      Can we also get rid of all the Arabic countries passing countless resolutions about Israel in the UN? Pretending they don’t have a bias is like pretending SA is a bastion of women’s rights.

      • @filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        It is not like Israel has been a human-rights role-model. You can open whichever human rights watch group and see what they think about it, or Wikipedia.

        And the whole reason Israel exists as a country is thanks to the UN.

      • jorge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Ah, yes. those Arabic countries like *checks notes* Brazil

  • @octatron@lmy.drundo.com.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Time to kick the US to the curb. Fuck em and their Christian BS. Do what must be done rest of the world. Permanent trade sanctions for Israel!

  • @octatron@lmy.drundo.com.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Time to kick the US to the curb. Fuck em and their Christian BS. Do what must be done rest of the world. Permanent trade sanctions for Israel!