Confidentiality. Or porn. One of those things.

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    yeah this whole article was an unnecessary rant which the author realized only after publishing.

    Update: A reader writes in with an obvious comment that did not occur to me:

    The obvious reason not to let people put things on the screens you own in public is that invariably people will put porn on them, and then you’ll have other people complaining that the united screen system is showing porn. They don’t say this because no corporate PR hack is going to talk about porn when it’s not necessary. But it’s definitely the real reason, and it’s one they will not and should not budge on.

    • mx_smith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Reminds me of the time when I was living in Phoenix and picking up a friend from the bus station. The bus departures came in one big door and right next to the door was one of them new standing internet kiosks that allowed you to browse the internet. This was back in 2003. I was checking it out to see what you could do and where it allowed you to go, when my friends bus came in. I was on goatse.cx and saw my friend and left the kiosk open and we went to leave and noticed many older Hispanic folks freaking out, or laughing as they entered the bus station. The timer ran out on the internet access, but it was a lot of fun with open monitors in public.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Then you’ll still have people screencast porn to their own screen, photograph it and post it on social media with a title like “United’s in-flight entertainment”.