• ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Shit take, the average person only used to have to do 20 hours a week of labour to feed their family

    Money didn’t make labour “more efficient”

    • Dämnyz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      This only works when you divide the time spent working over the year. As a medival peasant you worked your ass off in spring or whenever you sow your fields, kept it up while it grew, which was somewhat normal working times by todays standard, and toiled for double digit hours in harvesting season again. After that was time to do literally nothing. When you look at seasonal holidays in many european countries, they are mostly at the end of harvesting seasons, when you could easily be blackout drunk for a week because there was nothing else to be done. I personally don’t mind regular working hours when the alternative is half a year of 15 hour shifts and half a year of more or less no work.

      • Kage520@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Was it 7 days on of 15 hours? Because if it was only 6 and I had that one day break once a week and eventually got 6 months off later I would definitely want to do that.

    • rchive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You can easily have medieval levels of quality of life working like 1 hour a week today. No one, not even kings a few hundred years ago had modern quality of life even with vast amounts of wealth extracted from whole continents of peasants. Modern money and economic systems allow for global trade and innovation that makes things Napolean couldn’t dream of into boring every day stuff for you and me.