PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWerewolf nudity rulelemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down13
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkWerewolf nudity rulelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareTheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·3 days agoIf there were complaints, it makes one wonder if the model is anatomically correct and fully functional.
minus-squaresmokin_shinobi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·3 days agoThey weren’t in the movie at least.
minus-squareArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 days ago anatomically correct Well I suppose if a movie was intended to be very realistic, then… fully functional What!?
minus-squareAlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoDisplay mannequins in clothing stores get guest complaints if they’re naked, they’re not even anatomically correct there’s just a bump for the naughty bits on the male ones!
If there were complaints, it makes one wonder if the model is anatomically correct and fully functional.
They weren’t in the movie at least.
Well I suppose if a movie was intended to be very realistic, then…
What!?
Display mannequins in clothing stores get guest complaints if they’re naked, they’re not even anatomically correct there’s just a bump for the naughty bits on the male ones!