• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nero burning program used an icon of the colosseum on fire to represent their burn button.

    I see no issue with using a floppy disk.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Floppy Disk is Computer Jesus. They both died to become the universal symbol of salvation. ;)

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can still buy new 3 1/2" disks. And usb connected drives are available to read and write them. So they ain’t dead.

      But I do pour one out for the 5 1/4". The OG of common portable storage. It was the floppist of the floppies.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s some additional nostalgia attached to calling them with the simple fractions as opposed to the decimal ones, even if they mean the same thing. HDDs for example are still around and I’ve always seen their form factor as 3.5", not 3 1/2".

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone say three point five" HDDS or read it in the decimal form-- Three and 5 tenths. It’s always said as the fractional form-- 3 1/2".

          I think they mark them as 3.5" because it’s easier to typeset a decimal than fractions. Even those accursed 3 1/2" floppys seem to be marked 3.5" these days.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have seen the 8" floppys but never used one. I did use and have a fair collection of 5 1/4" for a good number of years. And I cursed the 3 1/2" floppies for their short, yet brutal lifespan. I can remember installing Windows 3.11 and AutoCAD 9 with a stacks of those accursed things. And daily backups for the bookkeeper were constant headache until we got a tape drive.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The idea that human society will make it to 4269 as well as the old Twitter logo at the bottom really dates this one. 😥

    • JokklMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      People probably said similar at the fall of every empire throughout history. People will endure and build anew. Life finds a way.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most other empires didn’t have the ability to destroy the ecosphere of the planet they lived on.

        The modern empires can do it not just on purpose using nuclear weapons, but also accidentally through climate change.

        Life will find a way, but will civilization? And will the dominant species still be humans?

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Planet will be fine and livable. It will be different, but livable. Even most nuclear war scenarios will not destroy everything, just most populated areas by now.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Liveable, maybe. But, maybe miserable. Like, the planet was liveable for hunter-gatherers during the ice age, but lives were short and brutal. We could be headed back in that direction.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Does any of that matter to the planet? Like any of the ancient plants and critters that have come and gone, humans will have their time and then pass from existence and memory. Something new and different will replace us.

          Such is evolution.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Does any of that matter to the solar system? I mean, one of the planets has some molecules that combine in complex ways. Big deal.

            • bluewing@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No it does not. Nor does the universe bother about galaxies. The point is that all things that exist have their time under the sun and then pass so something new and different can take it’s place.

              It’s huberous of the highest order to think everything will continue on as it is right now, And to try and preserve it all for your personal comfort.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s unlikely that people will go extinct, but we’re perfectly capable of creating a Mad Max or Fallout type of world.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 days ago

    The pointer icon is an arrowhead, ~74000 years old. I don’t want to hear people complaining about how old the floppy disk is.

  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s KDE software (might be a Linux-wide thing, idk) that changed it to a down arrow pointing to a rectangle. I don’t like it. I really don’t fucking like it.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I like it. It’s universally recognisable, you know what it means and what it does.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s only universally recognized because of precedent. The true challenge is to create something that can be understood by someone that has no background with computers (or whatever)

      Like the radiation ☢️ thing, danger ⚠️ , are supposed to be examples of this. Radiation more so because it’s not supposed to rely on language even

      Now excuse me while I press the call button on my phone which is shaped like a landline handset from 30 years ago

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        For sure, but it doesn’t actually matter whether it’s abstract from the outset or has become abstract through technological advance so long as it’s unique and understood. Someone who’s never seen a floppy disk will still learn it quickly, because it’s distinctive.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        How is the nuclear sign in any way universally understandable? It is properly by learning it’s meaning.

        • tiramichu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s intended to visually represent an atom with radiation emitting away from it.

          It’s not “univeral” in the sense that anyone could understand it, but in the sense that anyone who knows about what radiation is would have a clue - be them people now, or some far-future civilisation stumbling across a nuclear dump site, or aliens. It’s a depiction of what is going on.

          The symbol also uses elements of graphic design that make it feel unwelcoming and hostile even if you have no understanding at all. It’s a design that clearly telegraphs “this is not a good thing”

          Similar for the biohazard sign, which in its strange curves and spines looks almost “mutated”

          • deafboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            I respect all the science and research in hostile design, but then I rember the chilli peppers, just trying to keep safe from mamals by simulating the feeling of fire in their mouths…

            • moody
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Evolution doesn’t really work that way though. Peppers didn’t evolve spiciness to keep animals away, they essentially randomly developed a mutation that made them unpalatable to most animals, and that increased their odds of survival. It’s not doing X for Y reason, it’s X happening with Y as a consequence.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The design process is actually very interesting to read about and the intentionality (whether you think it’s effective or not) is essentially the scenario that if someone were to stumble across it in 10,000 years they would recognize it is dangerous and leave it alone

          That said you are probably right given there already have been a few notable incidents where people have broken into discarded medical equipment and stolen radioactive sources, poisoning dozens of people in the process

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s interesting how that precedent happened though.

        30 years ago saving something basically involved taking a floppy, putting it into the floppy drive, and then hitting a “save” button. That was often because computers didn’t even have a hard drive. And, when they did have a hard drive, having your files on a floppy drive was basically the only way to get them onto another computer. So, because of that, a floppy drive was pretty universally recognized as a place where you saved files.

        In the time since then, saving to a hard drive became more common. But, it’s hard to use a hard drive as an image for “save” because only computer geeks know what a hard drive actually looks like. Even if you could get people to recognize a hard drive icon it’s also ambiguous because you use your hard drive for many other things other than saving. Finally, it’s also less necessary to put the save files on external media, because you can email them, upload them, save to the cloud, etc.

        The only physical media where people still save things is USB thumb drives. So, you could put in an image of a USB thumb drive, which more people would recognize, but that’s more ambiguous because people only save files to a thumb drive in certain specific cases. It’s also harder because there’s not really a globally recognized thumb drive image. All floppy drives had to look more or less identical because of the constraints of the disk drive system. But, USB drives only have to have the USB part in common – and in some cases that’s hideable or retractable.

  • 7rokhym@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    My favourite are the kids excited that their mom 3D printed the save icon when she showed them a floppy disk.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Which never happens yet everyone repeats it as if it’s a common occurrence.

      I like the joke, but let’s not pretend this is something that happens.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    The various symbols found on audio and visual media comes from tape reel machines. Specifically the right arrow Play button only makes sense in relation to tape movement, yet we use it for just about any format to begin play.

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve seen a growing number of programs that use an arrow pointing towards a picture of a computer or hard drive for "save* and an arrow pointing away from it for “load” and I feel like that’s very graceful skeuomorph to shift to that might hold up for longer (although it breaks if it’s talking about cloud save, but replace the picture of a computer with picture of a cloud and you’re back in business I suppose)

  • WanakaTree@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    My wife coaches high school field hockey. She told me how one day she overheard them talking about how one of them lost their work on a homework document and had to start over.

    One of the girls said “you just gotta get in the habit of clicking the blue square”, which the others were confirming is the thing to do. So then my wife asks “blue square, what do you mean” and another clarified “the save button”.

    They had no idea what a floppy disc was

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I had to explain the save button to my 9 year old about a week ago. And then I found myself explaining what a floppy disk was. Tonight I’ll ask him if he knows what that is a picture of. I’ll be impressed if he remembers. If he fails the check, imma gonna launch into a lecture on boot disks, games, and batch files. Wish me luck!

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          After he masters that, get him an MFM or RLL hard drive and teach him to low level format it and set the best interleave.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’d be surprised if using these kinds of point-and-click GUIs was still common in 2244 years, as opposed to some kind of language- or thought processing. Then again, people are still writing with pen and paper sometimes, despite all the digital advances.

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Skeuomorphism is the word your looking for, its why your digital cameras still make a mechanical click sound even through there isnt a mechanical shutter