• @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    People have been talking about this for a while…

    Local producers can’t beat the price/quality of used Western clothes, so donating clothes actually hurts their society and prevents them from growing their own industries. So if we keep donating, theyll never become self sufficient.

    It’s a tricky situation

    • @highduc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I wonder if they couldn’t focus on other domestic industries instead? More lucrative ones. DW say 59,000 tons of clothes end up being thrown in the desert so it doesn’t seem like there’s a need to create even more clothes.

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        As much as I hate corporate subsidies, I think what would be better is letting the people making clothes, sell the donations rather than just the current resellers who aren’t contributing anything meanful.

        They can use the profits to reinvest into making their own. Eventually they’d be able to match the quality of used clothes, which would create meaningful job growth instead of a few clerks working at resale shops while the owners make huge profits.

        Like I said, it’s complicated

      • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

        DW

        Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

        I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

    • @Floey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Why is making a resource there is already an abundance of necessary for growth? Even if there is no room for any other kind of industry you could then move onto the service sector.

      • @drolex@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        All service sector jobs rely on some sort of resource or on manufactured products. A full service economy is impossible. And especially when there is a low demand for services because people keep their resources for essential commodities.

        • @Floey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The resource we are talking about is cheap clothing though. Producing cheap clothing just feels like digging holes to fill them back in again. Why would you want productive jobs that don’t actually produce anything of value? What would be the point of producing paperclips if someone either gave you a bunch of paperclips or sold them to you extremely cheaply?

          I get the self reliance aspect. However for clothing I don’t think it’s as important because a country isn’t going to collapse if it can’t get clothing imports for a year, like it would if it were reliant on food imports.

          Anyway, the over production of clothing for the West definitely is a problem, and it’s highlighted by cases like this. But I wouldn’t frame it as a necessarily a Ugandan problem. We shouldn’t glorify jobs or industry for the sake of jobs or industry, they should fill a purpose that isn’t filled in people’s needs and wants.

    • @criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Oh the other hand, if they have no issues with clothing they can use resources for another type of industry

  • alphacyberranger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    If only more people became of what fast fashion does to the planet and how it helps corporates fill their wallets.

    • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      You mean I don’t have to turn the fruits of my labour into trinkets that are only useful for less than the time it took me to labour to buy it in the first place?

      I’m sure I’m wasteful in other ways, but I’m thankful my wardrobe gets a new item only when an old item fails.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Downtown Kampala’s Owino Market has long been a go-to enclave for rich and poor people alike looking for affordable but quality-made used clothes, underscoring perceptions that Western fashion is superior to what is made at home.

    Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, a semi-authoritarian leader who has held power since 1986, declared in August that he was banning imports of used clothing, saying the items are coming “from dead people.”

    The East African Community trade bloc — consisting of Burundi, Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda — has recommended banning imports of used apparel since 2016.

    The clothes are cheap and drop further in price as traders make room for new shipments: a pair of denim jeans can go for 20 cents, a cashmere scarf for even less.

    The association of traders in Kampala, known by the acronym KACITA, opposes a firm ban on used apparel, recommending a phased embargo that allows local clothing producers to build capacity to meet demand.

    Some Ugandan apparel makers, like Winfred Arinaitwe, acknowledge that the quality of locally made fabric is often poor.


    The original article contains 856 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!