• takeda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    The crazy thing is that ignoring his scandals, ignoring his alcoholism (which should be disqualifying) guy’s rank alone makes him unqualified. During meetings he will be the dumbest man in the room.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Just because they got elected doesn’t mean we have to take this sitting down. The margin of victory was barely over 1%.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      well within the margin-of-error in pretty much any polling.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        What does the margin of error of a poll have to do with the outcome of an election? Like, I definitely think he’s got zero political mandate for anything because he barely won (and I think he only even got that because the Democratic party has a bunch of their voters stay home), but I am still pretty convinced that Trump did in fact win the election.

      • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yes because a poll is maybe a thousand people. It’s not when you poll millions of people.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Don’t know much about statistics I’m guessing. That’s more than enough of a sample size to represent a population. That’s why there’s a margin of error in polls.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 days ago

    that’s the ultimate in qualifications for half the senate to steamroll a nomination through.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    14 days ago

    “Critical Race Theory” is old news anyway. Even back in my day, liberal indoctrination was based off of “Latino and Colored Dominace” theory. Since the theory was much simpler, the books on it were thinner and less bulky to move around. The simplicity allow for a better vision and higher number of proposed resolutions.

    Though I will miss the sound Critical Race Theory made whenever I hit the “degauss” button on the side.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      Excellent post. You managed to shoehorn in your own opinion where there was arguably no room. Impressive.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Made me expel a small amount of air from my nose. I think most people just read the first few words and then downvoted.

      (Or didn’t think the context appropriate for making acronym-based jokes.)