It helps that we’re right. That it can’t be bad to eat what humans have eaten for 2 million years.

But 2 recent things I’ve looked at were studies done a few decades ago and shelved because they didn’t get the “right” answer, but were recovered recently and published showing the lipid hypothesis was wrong and the cause of metabolic disorder was carbohydrates

They were suppressed in the 70s and 80s, now they are published. Dietary guidelines in Australia (one of the biggest wheat exporters) now allow low carb for treating type 2 diabetes.

I do believe we’re watching a change in consensus (which as always is progressing one death at a time - perhaps it’s good that the other side is committed to a metabolically dangerous path)

  • jet@hackertalks.comM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are multiple battles here

    1. Low Carb is a safe health tool
    2. Meat isn’t dangerous
    3. cholesterol is not a disease
    4. Seed oils have a huge impact on health, insulin resistance
    5. PBF have a inflammatory cost on the body

    I think the best thing we can do is demonstrate what works for us, and be friendly resources to others if they have questions.

    The Anti-Meat movement is a fascinating world to research, it’s not just economic interests, we have some faith thrown in there too

    • psud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As far as I can tell low carb is fully accepted in psychiatric treatment, fairly accepted in diabetics, proven in weight loss but not widely prescribed, and nearly never used by for profit weight loss organisations because it’s so easy to DIY without any special products

      Researchers have also noticed that they can get a thousand zero carb eaters from Reddit with high adherence to animal sourced food only, and likewise vegans and vegetarians since we separate ourselves so well, so some good epidemiological research is possible where you can actually compare some hundreds of people who eat only meat to others who eat only plants

      It would probably be fairly straightforward to compare the spectrum from vegan through vegetarian, pescatarian, SAD, keto, ketovore, carnivore and all the shades of grey I missed though we’re probably unique in our ability to say exactly what we ate every day for years

      • jet@hackertalks.comM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        fully accepted

        I think that is optimistic, I don’t think lchf is embraced anywhere outside of niche research and novel practitioners. The change is happening, but it’s really slow.

    • psud@aussie.zoneOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s also so much money in the chain between a farm full of wheat to a box of highly processed “food”, compared to the simple path of meat varying from cheapest self harvested, self butchered, self stored through to using a professional butcher who buys from a meat packing plant through to the most expensive - supermarket meat

      Money plus religion versus reality

      • electricyarn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The imagined path of wheat is the same as the feed for almost all of the meat that’s eaten today.

        • psud@aussie.zoneOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Cows don’t eat breakfast cereal, bread, or cookies

          The cows I eat eat grass, the cheapest meat is raised on grass