Move comes in response to Canadian legislation requiring internet giants to pay news publishers

  • @Tibert@compuverse.uk
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Didn’t meta (Facebook) also threatened to remove news from Australia when a similar law passed? And they did nothing.

    • Because they struck a deal with the media companies in that case. That hasn’t happened with Canada. They’re gonna do it this time, and I’m sure Canada will be fine without getting its news through Facebook.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    91 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Meta has begun the process to end access to news on Facebook and Instagram for all users in Canada, the company said on Tuesday.

    The move comes in response to legislation in the country requiring internet giants to pay news publishers.

    Canada’s heritage minister, Pascale St-Onge, who is in charge of the government’s dealings with Meta, called the move irresponsible.

    Canada’s public broadcast CBC also called Meta’s move irresponsible and said that it was “an abuse of their market power”.

    Canada’s legislation is similar to a ground-breaking law that Australia passed in 2021 and had triggered threats from Google and Facebook to curtail their services.

  • @MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Meta had said links to news articles make up less than 3% of the content on its users’ feed and argued that news lacked economic value.

    Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, had said in May that such an argument was flawed and “dangerous to our democracy, to our economy”.

    • @MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I can believe it. My feed barely contains anyone I know or follow. Last time I checked, 31/36 things in my feed were things I never asked to see. Facebook is like watching network TV except it’s only commercials and every fifteen minutes they take a break and let you know how a friend is doing.

      I don’t go there very often.

    • @joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      It can’t be a flawed argument if it reflects reality. So if we accept Meta’s information to be accurate, then they’re just stating a fact. FB users don’t care about news articles, so attempts to wring money out of a third party isn’t going to work, as we can see here.

      I’ve always been dubious of the “you should pay us to send us traffic” stance that news organizations seem to take every 5 or so years. It never works out.

  • Grant_M
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Boycott greedy, unethical Zuckerberg #DeleteFacebook #BoycottBillionaires