• moody
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Also it’s 100k hours combined use over 50 printers at once, not one printer for 100k hours, which would likely be much more problematic.

        • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          16 hours ago

          That’s some serious click baiting. Naturally you can’t run a printer for more than 8760 hrs each year, so 100k is definitely of a hint. But then at least try for 12 printers instead

        • Atlusb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Correct but it does show their manufacturing is fairly reliable. I’m not for them for their attitude rather than their quality.

          • moody
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Agreed, just clarifying for the tl;dw gang just clicking for the headline.