I need to replace a faulty breaker. Here’s a picture of my main breaker box. There’s no master switch that I can see that shuts off power to all of the breakers.

Following the line up and out of the box, it runs along the basement ceiling and out through a hole in the foundation.

Let me know if you need to see something else.

Edit. Resolved! I found a master switch on the outside of the house in a panel adjacent to the meter. Weird that anyone can just walk up to my house and turn all of the power off.

  • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Weird that anyone can just walk up to my house and turn all of the power off.

    That’s the horror movie feature. Also, it’s safer for murderers to flip a switch than cut a wire. Please think of the murderers.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is your complete breaker box? No RCCB/RCD device? Wow. Here, any electrician would basically be forced by law to take this off the net until it is upgraded to code.

  • Anticorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Man, that’s one nasty looking breaker box! Glad you found the master switch.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I guess it’s the 70 amp one.

    That would make the:

    • 15 amps for lighting
    • 20 amps for room sockets
    • 30 amps for washing machine and kitchen appliances
  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you don’t need to turn the power back on, you can turn off all the power by throwing a gallon or two of water at it.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is really strange that there is no master switch. Are you sure this isn’t a sub-panel which is wired into another breaker box somewhere else in the building? I’d go hunting, following the main wire.

    There’s less than half of the number of breakers on here that I’d expect in a house.

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      My house is like that too. No master shutoff anywhere, so I’d have to call the power delivery company out to shut it off at the meter.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Have you looked at the meter box? Around here there will be a cover you can flip up under the meter head and turn off the breaker you find under it.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I recently found out this is code now where I live: you must have a master breaker outside with the meter. While I can understand the benefits from a safety and service point of view, this seems mostly like an invitation for “pranks”.

          My electrician had to go through contortions to explain how one approach let him just make the change I needed whereas the other may have seemed cleaner but would require him to redo the service entrance to add an outside main breaker

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 days ago

        That would never pass inspection here… Might depend on where you live I guess

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 days ago

          I toured a house that still had TL fuses and cloth-wrapped electrical…No inspection needed in 2025 if it passed in 1940 and was never updated!

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s normal. It’s meant to be that way. You only have to get up to current code when making major changes, and only for what you’re changing. If you always had to be up to date, no one could afford to maintain a house: you’d be making changes every year.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Yeah, I was just giving an example that inspections aren’t required. A less extreme example would be asbestos tiles/insulation but that’s not dangerous unless you damage it

    • akilou@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is a subpanel that this one feeds. See the 70 amp breaker? That’s goes upstairs to another panel there.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Check on the other side of that wall and see if the main breaker is there. I know it’s code now to have the main breaker on the outside of the house. I think it’s so power can be turned off when needed even if the homeowner isn’t home.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Was fine when it was put in, but code updated and old installations usually aren’t required to upgrade to meet new codes unless you try to change them substantially.

  • BlazarNGC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think you’re needing to search for the main breaker. This is looking like a sub panel.