• Pantsofmagic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    431 year ago

    UHD Blu-rays still have value and relevance. This is unfortunate.

    • Bilbo Baggins
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      I love commentary and streaming services almost never have it. That’s the biggest loss.

    • @Klystron@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Value for sure, but relevance? I challenge you to find one of your non tech obsessed friends (most of the population) that is still actively buying physical media or even still owns a disc player. I don’t even think I’ve heard my friends say the word blu ray in years.

      • @quinnly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Depends on age I think. All my 40+ year old friends have large DVD collections, as well as some in their 30s. I could see people younger than 30 not giving a shit about physical media. Personally I would go physical over digital.

        • @PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I had DVD collection but already don’t watch or use/have a DVD player for longest time.(well I did have consoles that can play them. But I just never play them from disc.)

          I just buy to support the film/anime/singer, download a high quality rip and play from my archive when I needed. (So if for any chance I got swatted I can show them I already bought the media already. I did the same for digital only purchase as well as I don’t like streaming quality.)

          Like does it makes a lot difference between UHD vs a proper high bit-rate encoded rip? In my experience, if you never pause and compare side by side stepping frame, you probably won’t notice. (Yeah, bad encoding you can obviously notice, or some ultra wide with custom crop for easier encoding/smaller size).

      • Midnight Wolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        Their analytics staff: HOLY SHIT WE GOT A HIT ON ‘FAX MACHINES’ WE ARE GOING TO FINALLY UNLOAD THESE THINGS

        an hour later

        Analytics: they didn’t actually purchase any

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        A lot of them are printer/scanner combo machines that have fax functionality, rather than a dedicated fax machine.

        Which makes sense, I assume it’s not that much more expensive to produce it with the required parts (if any). Rest is software

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      They do, many business still use and need them.

        • JJROKCZ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          If the hospital you send you employees to for workers comp says they want paperwork faxed, then you need a fax machine. Are there better ways to do it? Yea, but the hospital isn’t interested in that and you don’t get to argue so you have to use the fax like they said.

        • Otter
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          You could say that about any technology that isn’t cutting edge. The problem is when something is still standard in a particular industry, then yes you do “need” them.

          Ideally we’d switch to better methods, but it takes time and organized effort.

          • @Hawke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            At this point the effort and time to keep physical fax machines is greater than dropping them.

            • Otter
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              A lot of fax machines are just integrated into a regular printer/scanner, which is why you can find them fairly easily

              But yea a dedicated machine makes no sense now

              • @Hawke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                With POTS lines getting up to $1000/month in some cases, it’s not even the equipment that’s the problem.

  • @Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I was in the used video game store today and they had a huge bin of Blu-ray’s, including really good movies, for $3 each.

    It’s dead

  • @rasputin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Boutique media distributors still exist for the limited audience still wanting physical media. For that I am grateful. Best Buy is cutting their losses, we live in a digital age, sad as it is for those who love collecting.

    I’ll be really bummed when the next gen game consoles are 100% digital and that be that for game collecting. Alas, nothing lasts forever.

  • Skybreaker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    They’ve been implementing this for the past 2 years. So stupid

  • @Pasta4u@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    Really wish they created a new format based on nand technology like an nvme drive. Make it read only and just give us 1tb movies woth extremely high bit rates. I’d pay $50 a movie for that maybe even mote for certain movies.

      • @Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        You’d still want to make it easier for end users to use.

        I’m thinking something the size of a fire TV box that accepts something the size of the Xbox series nvme cart. That way they cam still have art work and make it easy to switch the movies. For large file sizes like that it’s still better fir a lot of people to just buy the completed cart.

        • @vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          the difference is that the discs cost cents to make. What you’re suggesting is, at best, insanely more expensive to produce.

          • @Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Nand prices continue to drop off a cliff. I just bought a 2tb nvme from microcenter for $65

            The only advantage of disc is that it’s cheap. However we can look at the music industry and people willing to pay a premium on vinyl.

            Bluray is limited by its transfer rate which is what 100-150 MB/s. While nand can go into the tens of GB/s. You also go from a 128GB of storage space into the terabytes of storage.

            You couple an insane increase in transfer rate plus an insane increase in storage and then you have a videophile product. So sure Joe six pack won’t buy it at walmart but let’s be real they arent buying Blu rays anymore. Now is the time to go after collectors and those who want the best quality possible

  • stopthatgirl7
    link
    fedilink
    -11 year ago

    I feel like this is a bad sign of things to come - like sooner rather than later, it’s going to be impossible to own physical copies of our media, and companies no longer want us to buy copies of things, just sign up for never-ending streaming services.