• @nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      369 months ago

      Yeah, I get what they mean but it doesn’t work as written. They mean that it is “designed to fail as a measure to protect workers“

    • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      159 months ago

      US and UK companies with foreign operations use audits to prevent worker abuse – but auditors say the checks aren’t working

      I think they mean that they fail to accomplish their goal. But you’re not wrong in that it’s poorly worded.

  • @sartalon@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    189 months ago

    The solution is obvious. Hire an auditing firm to audit the auditing firms.

    Bonus points if the auditing firm, hired to audit, subcontracts the auditing to the firm they are supposed to audit.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    89 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    When Ahmed scrutinized the attendance and pay records the company provided him, he found they had been falsified, in part because security footage showed the man was truly enduring a grueling schedule.

    In interviews with the reporting partnership, nearly 100 workers describe an array of unfair and repressive labor practices within the Persian Gulf footprints of Amazon, McDonald’s, Chuck E Cheese and the InterContinental Hotels Group.

    Dozens of firms perform hundreds of thousands of audits each year of labor, environmental and safety practices for many Fortune 500 companies and a host of smaller corporations.

    “A vast majority of the social audit industry is so opaque that it doesn’t build trust with workers and their representatives and the lack of transparency is also fertile ground for the worst malpractices to thrive unchecked,” says Kashyap.

    After interviewing 20 former and current auditors and dozens of industry experts, Kashyap concluded that auditing companies often don’t operate independently or transparently, acting more frequently as a way for brands to burnish their image than to keep workers safe.

    “It is scandalous how much power has been afforded to multinational corporations, American brands, to dictate the terms of their own complicity because they have lawyers to say they checked all the boxes and are human trafficking compliant,” says Elena Shih, an assistant professor at Brown University and the author of Manufacturing Freedom: Sex Work, Anti-Trafficking Rehab, and the Racial Wages of Rescue.


    The original article contains 2,236 words, the summary contains 236 words. Saved 89%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!