• Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 hour ago

    UnitedHealth Group is so vertically integrated that, in fact they do own doctors, hospitals and pharmacies under the Optum brand. So yes, they do have a duty to take care of people even if they act like they don’t.

  • @floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    406 hours ago

    it’s a business that helps you pay your bills

    Quite the opposite, it’s a business that makes your bills expensive.

  • @drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    276 hours ago

    Yeah, similarly, Burger King doesn’t have to give you the whopper you’ve paid for. BK employees didn’t take an oath to feed you whoppers. They only have taken an oath to the managers, who have taken an oath to the CEO, who has taken an oath to Friedrich Hayek and the shareholders to make shitloads in dividends, as is their social responsibility. Everything is working just fine in our society thanks to these nice concepts.

  • @TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    139
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Without realizing it, Mike Beasley makes a great argument for why private, for-profit health insurance shouldn’t exist.

    • @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 hours ago

      It’s like all the media that think they are defending Brian Thompson by saying he was less horrible than the average healthcare CEO. Sometimes I wonder if they are making an argument for resurrecting the guillotine industry.

  • themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9013 hours ago

    “It’s a business” is not a justification for evil, and yet that’s always how the phrase is used.

  • @dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3711 hours ago

    It’s my understanding that health insurance companies hire doctors, who have taken the hypocritical oath, to review claims and deny them.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          -910 hours ago

          When the insurance company describes their functional area is the term “medical decision” listed anywhere?

          Asking for a friend

          • @T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            57 hours ago

            If the insurance company declines a patient’s treatment, citing that they believe it to be unnecessary, against the recommendations of their healthcare provider, is that a non-medical decision, then?

  • @deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The very concept of paying for health care through insurance is evil.

    Why do we even allow a profit motive to deny health care? Should be straight up illegal.

  • Endymion_Mallorn
    link
    fedilink
    1611 hours ago

    We should stop calling it “insurance”, it doesn’t ensure anything. We should call it what it is - a protection racket. Either that, or we could refer to it as “medical loans” - of course, it’s all paid in advance, in many installments. Oh wait. That’s just defining a protection racket again, isn’t it?

  • @shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1712 hours ago

    Funny how life insurance always pays, no problem. Because if they get a bad rep, people will go elsewhere. We can’t do that with employer-covered healthcare!

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      210 hours ago

      These tricks are many, this is just the tip.

  • @solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    insurance is a fucking scam that preys on the most vulnerable segment of the population in order to enrich themselves and their shareholders. and the vast majority of people think that’s just the way things are in america, therefore it’s the best possible way for things to be. what’s not to understand?

    • @agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 hours ago

      The free market is excellent at producing, at a reasonable cost, myriad voluntary luxuries like large televisions and speedy cars. These prices are naturally constrained by the consumers’ willingness to do-without. When the consumer cannot rationally choose to do-without, the elegant self-regulation intrinsic to the free market evaporates.

  • femtech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1813 hours ago

    That why insurance should not be for profit.