• @Whampahoofus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Because dairy farmers are so indebted that even a small shortfall of revenue could mean ruin. The system can’t stop or there will be massive financial collapse in that segment of the population. There needs to be a one-time government buyback of dairy assets if you want to end the cycle, and get these farmers out of their debt. Otherwise, the system will be perpetuated.

    • @the_q@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Then they should fail. It’s not like they haven’t had years and years and years to make changes. The world is changing. Keep up or get out of the way.

      • Rozaŭtuno
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Then they should fail

        With our current economic system, that’s not possible. It’s set to privatize profits and socialize losses.

        Failing is only for the poor.

    • @OddFed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      But… but why would I care? They had enough chances (and still have) to leave the sinking ship.

      People don’t give a flying fuck about hotels, restaurants, local retailers, taxi companies and what not, but the second it’s the “poor farmers” it’s suddenly a huge moral issue.

      • @Whampahoofus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Often dairy farming is a family business, and so you’re born into it. These systems of subsidies are quite old, and so you have a lot of momentum. The debt, assets and revenues all pass over from generation to generation. It is hard to leave, and many do, mind you, through suicide.

        https://www.suicideinfo.ca/local_resource/agriculture-and-suicide/

        In democracies, farmers are a solid conservative block of support. Any discussion of removing their entitlements will unleash a wrath that the government can easily pay to avoid. I agree that large scale dairy is a problem, but I don’t think government is going to help fix this by removing entitlements, rather by subsidizing the alternatives, and by offering bail outs to any dairy farmer who is willing to reforest their pasture, and sell that land back for conservation.

        This problem, in particular, is very expensive to fix.

        • @OddFed@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          The same statement can be made about hotels, restaurants, taxi companies, local retailers. You are also usually born into it. Your parents run a pub and you take it over. Yet “Yay Airbnb!”.

  • @willybe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Remember when Starbucks used to be a coffee shop? Now it is a cow fat milk shake shop, with whipping cream on top.

  • @Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Cheese probably. Fucking love cheese. Pls diary isn’t just milk. It’s chocolate it cake it’s so many things.

    I’m all for swapping to coconut milk for things that it can replace. If we can replicate it at some level or just plant a shit tonne of coconut trees. Potentially good for environment and nice for us.

    Cheese would be an issue though.

    • @thisfro@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Cake and chocolate can be made easily without dairy. Cheese is a lot harder, especially aged cheese. But alternatives get better by the day

    • RockyBockySocky
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Something tasting nice isn’t a good reason to subsidize a destructive industry.

      There’s less harmful and still great tasting alternatives.