He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion… Nor is it enough that he should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them…he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.

  • John Stuart Mill
  • @11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    46 hours ago

    My day one bottom bitch, as Butters would call it, for news source I don’t always agree with but love: Jon Stewart. I lean right, especially back when The Daily Show was airing with Jon Stewart. Never mattered tho, always loved his perspective and wish I could list the amount of shit he’s brought to my attention or changed my stance on.

  • @pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    515 hours ago

    In the US and I read mountains of business and economic news,much of most of it assumes the reader supports and agrees with the underlying premises of cronie capitalism. It’s a really helpful way to understand how businesses operate, think and where economy and society will be driven.

  • @josefo@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    415 hours ago

    I have a group of friends that are essentially the opposite of what I think, keeping them as friends is a challenge. Without reaching the point of being actual Nazis, they are as far right as they get, and also ancaps. They expose me to the internals of how they think, is very interesting.

  • WSJ. The news stuff is usually okay but the opinion section is a bit wild sometimes. I get the subscription for free and the business/financial news is generally good.

  • @pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    114 hours ago

    I follow a lot of podcasts that are either center-left sources or Democratic party cheerleaders: NPR and the NPR Politics Podcast, Ezra Klein (God he’s an insufferable twat), the Daily, Pod Save America…some of these I listen to because I want to know what the, “mainstream American left,” believes, some of them just have good information; NPR’s Up First is a great 15 minute morning news wrap, and the Daily does good in depth reporting (even better when Michael Barbaro is on vacation).

    I don’t listen to right-wing pundits like Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsh very often. They’re mostly culture war crap, and there’s usually very little information to be gained from them. I do regularly read conservative reporting though, mostly WSJ and the Economist.

    • @Classy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      213 hours ago

      I can’t help but agree with you, most conservative media is so smug and smarmy, it’s insufferable. “Don’t Walk, Run!” is an example, same with Piers Morgan. Like, can’t these guys say their piece without acting like fucking Ben Shapiro? It’s rare you find a regular, lucid guy just talking about political news or having discussions with the other side.

      I’m fascinated by Anna Kasparian’s political evolution over the past year, and I’m almost tempted to see what TYT are up to these days.

      • @pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        28 hours ago

        Yeah, I fell off of TYT in 2017 or 2018 for a lot of the same reasons I can’t stand listening to right-wing pundits; a lot of smug and little information (mostly from Cenk). I hadn’t heard anything about Ana Kasperian. What happened with her?

        There are some leftist podcasts that I like, but they are kinda just angry and unproductive, like The Insurgents; I only listen to them when I’m deeply angry or they have a good guest. The Lever is probably the best new left-wing podcast I’m listening to right now, and the Majority Report is always great.

        • @Classy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          15 hours ago

          Ana seems to have become a lot less radical/“everyone I disagree with is a Nazi” than she used to be. Not to say she still isn’t far-left, but that she’s now more willing to talk to and be friends with, say, Trump voters. She has been going on more moderate and right-leaning podcasts etc and having healthy debates and not just screeching like she was famous for doing in 2016.

  • @commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    18 hours ago
    • Glenn Beck
    • mark Levin
    • Steve deace
    • Allie Beth stuckey
    • jp sears
    • the daily wire

    the thing is, I find that news/commentary ALWAYS comes with bias, and I prefer not to beat up people on “my” side.

  • @Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    71 day ago

    The only news site I follow is my country’s equivalent of the BBC, which leans left. Lemmy also skews heavily to the left, but the podcasts I listen to tend to be more centrist or center-right from my perspective - though some might argue that someone like Joe Rogan is far-right, which I disagree with.

    I don’t align myself with any particular side. I form my opinions on an issue-by-issue basis rather than adopting the beliefs of “my side” - whatever that may be - as a package deal. I’ve been on the right, and I’ve been on the left, but I’ve since settled somewhere in the middle. I feel like I have a fairly accurate understanding of both perspectives and can often argue for most hot topics from either side’s point of view.

    • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      324 hours ago

      I don’t align myself with any particular side. I form my opinions on an issue-by-issue basis rather than adopting the beliefs of “my side” - whatever that may be - as a package deal.

      I’d like to think that most people do this, but unfortunately I know better. I would like to say, however, that it’s possible to make your own independent decisions about each issue, have them align with one party more than the other, and then identify with the party that your views align with. As long as your views define your party, rather than your party defining your views, there is nothing wrong with identifying with the party that you’re closest to.

  • Bear
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 day ago

    Everything. My default position is disagreement.

  • @cRazi_man@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    141 day ago

    I don’t have an answer to your question, but I love your John Stuart Mill quote. I’ve just had a barrage of comments trying to rip me apart for suggesting that a political opponent’s position should be understood; and no comprehension of the point this quote puts across really well.

    • @infinite_ass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      416 hours ago

      The membership of Lemmy is overly-emotional, flibbertigibbety infants, as a rule. It’s disheartening. It’s the mainstream. Bobbleheads as far as the eye can see.

    • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      324 hours ago

      I’ve just had a barrage of comments trying to rip me apart for suggesting that a political opponent’s position should be understood

      Ironically, I’ve never understood the mindset of those commenters. How can you argue against something, or even know if you should argue against it, without knowing what “it” even is?

      I generally go a step further than believing that every argument should be understood, and say that every argument should be considered as well. You shouldn’t reject an argument purely because it gives you bad vibes. If it’s obviously wrong, it should be obvious why it’s wrong. In practice you don’t always have time to engage with someone promoting obviously dumb ideas, but you should at least yourself know why you consider them to be wrong. I call this “radical possibilism” because you always consider the possibility that an argument is correct.

    • @Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      Glad you liked it, It’s one of my favourites.

      Sorry about the barrage of unfun comments. The internet is so wonderful and so goddamn annoying at the same time eh?

      • @cRazi_man@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        41 day ago

        Thanks. Comments don’t really bother me. It would be a hard life trying to use social media without thick skin.

        But your quote came at a good time to make the point I was looking to make.

        For your question about news, I would highly recommend using an RSS app. Whichever news source you use, its much better when you get your news in time order instead of their stupidly curated website front pages.

          • @cRazi_man@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            I only use it on android, but there are RSS apps on every platform.

            I think Pluma is the best.

            Of you care about it being free and open source, then “Read You” on f-droid.

            If you search for RSS on any app store it will give you lots of options and you can look through screenshots to see what you like.

        • @Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          21 day ago

          RSS is a great idea, not sure why I haven’t done that. Maybe I’ll set one up this weekend!

          Thanks!

  • @neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 day ago

    I sometimes skim Breitbart just to see what the current talking points and bugbears are. Calling it news is a stretch, though - I find that it better fits the definition of a blog.

    • @Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      71 day ago

      Good definition.

      And you’re a better person than I am, I tried a few times but felt really icky really quickly.

      I just gotta believe there’s something that offers a coherent defense of their positions without (or at least, with less of) the absolute craziness. Foreign policy ones, sure, Foreign Affairs works. But for a defense of say, trump’s immigration strategy or something, I’d love to have what the National Review used to be arguing for it, just to know what I’m missing.

      • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        224 hours ago

        I just gotta believe there’s something that offers a coherent defense of their positions without (or at least, with less of) the absolute craziness.

        Let me know if you find it. At this point I sincerely believe I’m not missing anything, and that’s a sad thought.

  • Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    101 day ago

    I don’t really follow right-wing news sources, as much as I follow right-wing commentators. I already know what the news on the right says, but what I’m interested in is how the people on the right actually interpret that news; which points they choose to regurgitate, and which points the average person on the right will latch onto. FOX News can say 30 different things about one particular news story, but generally the audience will only focus on one or two.

  • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 day ago

    I read the Financial Times despite being on the left but I find that useful because they don’t cover DC drama unless it legitimately matters. I’m not at all interested in broadening my horizons by reading American conservative bullshit. I already know what they’re going to say. I prefer to read new perspectives. To give an example, I’d rather read a novel by an African woman than learn what propaganda Fox News is pushing. I just don’t care anymore.

    “Merely having an open mind is nothing. The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.”

    — G.K. Chesterton

    • @Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      Oh no, I wouldn’t recommend Fox or Newsmax or the ilk on anyone.

      But I do like to understand what the best version of things I disagree with are. Wider perspectives are important but if I agree with all of them? I dunno, it feels intellectually lazy to me. That’s why I’m asking! I’d like to find something akin to what the National Review used to be.

      Otherwise, to me at least, there’s a very real danger of becoming the kind of person who writes off everyone who disagrees with me as ignorant, bigoted or evil. Which, in my opinion, isn’t a great way to live. Though, admittedly, I’ve always found those “everything is black or white” folks to be insufferably boring so maybe I’m just trying to not be that person instead of any high minded ideal.

      Sorry I’m tired and rambling while pooping.

      • @Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 day ago

        Not all opinions are inherently valid or valuable though. That’s the Paradox of Tolerance. You do eventually have to draw a line, because some people will use the benefit of the doubt to dismantle democracy

      • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        224 hours ago

        Though, admittedly, I’ve always found those “everything is black or white” folks to be insufferably boring so maybe I’m just trying to not be that person instead of any high minded ideal.

        I appreciate this level of introspection. I think you’re right to keep an open mind and to seek a broader view of the issues, but don’t be afraid for the conclusion you draw to be that someone or some opinion is ignorant, bigoted, or hateful. You should be open to any possibility… but as anticlimactic as it is, sometimes something really is black or white; that’s a possibility just like any other. Understanding why someone hateful thinks the way they do is useful, but it doesn’t change the fact that they are.

        TL;DR: If you never consider other viewpoints, you’ll never find the right one, but if you never stop considering them, you’ll never find the right one either. I wish you luck in your pursuit of knowledge.

  • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    324 hours ago

    I’m on Lemmy obviously, and generally I agree with all the leftist takes here, but sometimes I think they stray too far from reality. Not in their extremism (I’m fine with that) but literally just that they’re based off of unreal facts or logic (insert Ben Shapiro joke here).

    I don’t follow any right-wing news sources directly, but whenever I see articles posted around, there are topics that I generally take issue with the coverage of by “normal” newspapers, especially the Israel situation (horribly misrepresented in Israel’s favor by most western media).

    Since I try to align my beliefs with reality, and I don’t tend to follow news sources that don’t accurately portray reality, ideally I wouldn’t follow any news source that I regularly disagree with. Opinion articles are fair game though.

    • @infinite_ass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      316 hours ago

      Since I try to align my beliefs with reality, and I don’t tend to follow news sources that don’t accurately portray reality, ideally I wouldn’t follow any news source that I regularly disagree with.

      Said every dogmatic, orthodox zealot since the beginning of time.