• @mostvexingparse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    The best comment I read on this topic was “Before AI replaces us, our customers must first learn to precisely formulate what they actually want. We’re safe.”

      • @Holyginz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Lmao, I’m not a programmer although i know how, and even if I was I wouldn’t be worried for good reason. AI requires explicit instructions for everything. So in order to use it to code you need to be a programmer.

        • @Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          I’m not a programmer and I’ve used it to code. It rarely works the first time around, but I’m sure it will improve quickly to be more accurate.

      • @Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I’m also not worried. Software complexity generally grows proportional to the complexity of the requirements. And most projects I’ve been a part of, no one could have told you all the requirements even after we’ve figured them out.

        The code + test code is usually the only document that describes the requirements. And with high-level languages, there’s not that much boilerplate around the codified requirements either. Besides, we can use LLMs for that boilerplate ourselves.