• @Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    579 months ago

    I get they wanted to make the title punny. But in context, it’s hard to tell if horrifying reviews, are good or bad for a horror movie.

  • ryan213
    link
    fedilink
    English
    169 months ago

    Is that a lot just for the rights? Sounds like a lot.

  • @Sylver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    159 months ago

    That really is a pretty big gamble. At $400m, they’re competing with some big name releases that made $500m

    And I’m sure they’ll want more than just 100 in the green

    • Walt J. Rimmer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      $400m for the rights alone. It doesn’t talk about cost of production.

      Meaning they’re looking to make that rights cost back across the trilogy rather than from one film, but they’re constantly adding costs along the way.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    89 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The first film in a planned horror trilogy, Exorcist: Believer is getting rather poor reviews — scoring only a 28 22 20 percent average on Rotten Tomatoes.

    Universal reportedly paid a head-spinning $400 million for the rights to the franchise in 2021, and Believer needs to generate enough momentum to help launch two more sequels.

    Yet as producer Jason Blum pointed out to IndieWire in March, The Exorcist: Believer needs to generate some head-spinning box office returns.

    “The riskiest movie I have ever made for sure is not out yet,” said Blum (M3GAN, Get Out, The Black Phone), who is regarded as the most prolific and successful horror hitmaker working today.

    The film centers on Victor Fielding (Leslie Odom Jr.), whose daughter (Lidya Jewett) and her friend (Olivia Marcum) become possessed.

    Yet neither title came close to the $30 million domestic opening weekend revenue that’s predicted for Believer and was scored by The Nun 2 — which received only a 52 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes.


    The original article contains 614 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!