• @zephyreks@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Presumably, antiwar protestors protest every war. Basically, a return to WW2 America’s policy of non-intervention.

    • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Turns out being anti-war protesters means they’re ANTI WAR.

      What do you want them to do? Raise funds to send some missles over?

            • davel [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              You didn’t tell me what action will end the war faster, other going to the negotiating table. Ukraine is running out of bodies to throw into the meat grinder. This is a war of attrition, and the numbers are not in their favor.

        • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          -261 year ago

          Wouldn’t providing Ukraine with more weapons extend the war? Their latest offensive shows they’re running on fumes.

          • Zorque
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            You’re right, they should just roll over and accept Russian domination.

            Their comment, of course, was overly simplistic. I’m sure what they meant was “then why are they protesting action that will end the war in Ukraine’s favor faster”.

            If you only care about blindly ending war as soon as possible by any means necessary, you definitely have two major options. Either let the aggressor do whatever they want, or use overwhelming force to utterly destroy them.

            Which is your preference?

            • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              If you only care about blindly ending war as soon as possible by any means necessary, you definitely have two major options. Either let the aggressor do whatever they want, or use overwhelming force to utterly destroy them.

              Except this is assuming that the US is omnipotent. The US cannot use overwhelming force to defeat Russia in the conflict. That leaves only not supplying arms to reduce the length of the war and casualties.

              • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Except this is assuming that the US is omnipotent. The US cannot use overwhelming force to defeat Russia in the conflict.

                Good thing pretty much every western country is supporting Ukraine’s defensive war effort.

                Nobody expects the US to be the sole support for Ukraine.

                • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 year ago

                  Good thing pretty much every western country is supporting Ukraine’s defensive war effort.

                  How is that going?

              • Zorque
                link
                fedilink
                -11 year ago

                So you prefer just letting aggressors do whatever they want, got it.

                As anti-war as you or I may be, there’s more than enough petty dictators who are more than happy to be pro-war and fuck up the world.

                • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So you prefer just letting aggressors do whatever they want

                  I dont have that principle, I think there are cases when you should and when you shouldn’t.

                  there’s more than enough petty dictators who are more than happy to be pro-war and fuck up the world.

                  I’m more concerned about the US. Why is biggest kid on the block when it comes to genocide and war so enthusiastic to supply Ukraine with arms?

                  Especially given operation AERODYNAMIC by the cia…

          • @thantik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So I’m gonna come over to your house and commandeer 2 bedrooms. You can’t do anything about it, because that would be violent and non-productive. Thanks for the 2 bedrooms. I’m gonna shit on the carpet and in 10 years send my children to take the rest of your house. But again, you can’t do anything because that would be violent and non-progressive.

            Because you know, wouldn’t want there to be any conflict or anything.

            • @freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              -31 year ago

              This is so brain dead. Let’s frame using your idiocy.

              Russia is a house. Ukraine is a house. USA is a house. Russia gave up on their project of building a workers’ state and attempted to join the liberal capitalist world dominated by the USA. The USA sent economists to Russia’s house. The economic reforms killed as many people as though Russia had been invaded.

              Still, Russia wanted to join the USA’s economic dominance. But, the USA had built a transnational nuclear military specifically to counter the Russian military. They staffed it with officers from the Third Reich. They built Operation Gladio, Operation Paperclip, and Operation Aerodynamic. These operations grabbed the most violent bullies in the world and protected them, put them into houses neighboring Russia’s house, and took the one’s already there and gave them all weapons and training.

              Still, Russia wanted to join the USA’s economic dominance. They asked the USA to not expand NATO to its borders, sorry, to it’s front lawn because that would be impossible for Russia to defend against. Russia was run by a stooge that the USA controlled. That stooge hand-picked Putin under USA guidance. Putin continued attempting to appease the USA despite it’s bullying. Russia was trying to join NATO to ensure mutual security concerns could be discussed in committee instead of on the battle field.

              The USA finally rejected Russia explicitly and kept training and arming bullies. Every time the HOA tried to ban the practice of glorifying the Nazi bullies in the neighborhood, the USA vetoed it.

              The USA kept building more and more gangs and they kept building more supply lines and more weapons and more capabilities and finally tried to install those capabilities on Russia’s front lawn. During this time, Russia escalated its readiness and it even took military action to prove that if the gangs kept coming they would react.

              The gangs kept coming.

              Russia reacted.

              Your story has absolutely ZERO relevance to the actual history of the situation.

            • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              -381 year ago

              Stop trying to simplify geopolitics into interpersonal metaphors.

              In your metaphor what is the billions in human killing machines that NATO et al supply to Ukraine? Who would be the thousands dead and families destroyed?

              • @thantik@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                311 year ago

                I’ll stop simplifying geopolitics as soon as you recognize the right of the Ukrainian people to defend their land by whatever means is necessary. Every nation in the history of mankind has conscripted its citizens to aid in its defense. Russia will continue to take, and take, and take until someone shows them they cannot take freely any more. This anti-war absolutism is Russian propaganda designed to further their goals of illegal annexation of territory belonging to Ukraine.

              • SanguinePar
                link
                fedilink
                131 year ago

                You know what would have prevented that? Russia not invading Ukraine.

      • Zorque
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        I guess Ukraine could just use hopes and prayers to get Putin out of their front yard.

          • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            -39
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Is it actually reducing harm to fight to the last Ukrainian though? There were multiple attempts at peace that were sabotaged by either nazi paramilitaries or nato-member politicians. Remember when Zelensky traveled to the front to tell them to respect the ceasefire during Minsk 2 and they didn’t? Maybe the people sabotaging peace would be less bold knowing the US isn’t going to keep supplying arms.

            • Walt J. Rimmer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              261 year ago

              Is it actually reducing harm to fight to the last Ukrainian though?

              When Russia is trying to commit genocide against Ukraine? Yes.

                • Lucky
                  link
                  fedilink
                  161 year ago

                  It’s been widely reported by numerous nations and organizations. Search for “Russian genocide Ukraine” and you’ll see plenty of credible sources

            • Feste the Mad
              link
              fedilink
              -51 year ago

              multiple attempts at peace

              What were the terms of this peace? Do you have sources to back up your claims?

                • Feste the Mad
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -11 year ago

                  No I am not. Would you kindly explain and provide sources for this and all your other claims?

        • @panchzila@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          I have never thought of the usa helping ukraine because they are interested in ukranian peoples lives. I see them fighting because gaining an ally with great resources and an excellent geographic position is important to maintain power.

          They are also testing the new way of running a war between first world armies.

          Perhaps I’m wrong but this war benefits american interests beyond being world police.

          • phillaholic
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Or, and stay with me here, we have a blueprint from about a hundred years ago of what happens when you just let a powerful county annex surrounding countries. Spoiler Alert, they don’t just stop at 1.

  • @Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Peace in Ukraine? Tell that to all the civilians in Bucha and other places that have bullets in their back, got executed against buildings, or were tied up and shot in the back of the head.

    The russians even execute their own men with sledgehammers for being POWs. It’s like walking in to Sandy Hook mid-massacre and asking “Why can’t we all just be friends?” until you catch some 5.56 like an idiot.

    Ukraine should invite these people out to the front to see what it’s like, and talk to the civilians in recently liberated areas. Have them talk to the survivors and families of Bucha.

      • @Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Telling the Ukrainans to compromise will never work. The russians will continue to kidnap their children and push Ukrainans into the sea unless they secure all of their land. And even then, they’ll be forced into an Israel-like state of constant bombardment from their neighbors.

        It’s a shitty fucking deal. But the russian army and government are monsters. And the peace protestors that MTG cheers on aren’t on the side of the Ukrainians. Surrendering is not peace to the Russians. It’s capitulation.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Eleven antiwar protesters were arrested Wednesday after they occupied the office of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Capitol Hill to demand the senator support efforts at diplomacy over sending further U.S. aid, such as weapons, to Ukraine.

    Capitol Police arrested the 11 people inside the Dirksen Senate Office Building under a D.C. code that prohibits crowding, obstructing or incommoding, a Capitol Police spokesperson said.

    The code is often cited when arresting protesters during peaceful planned acts of civil disobedience.

    “Yes, Bernie should condemn the Russian invasion, but he should also be calling for a negotiated end to this brutal war,” Crystal Zevon, from Barnet, Vt., said in the news release.

    A spokesperson for Sanders said the senator’s chief of staff, foreign policy adviser and Vermont state director met with Vermonters who were concerned about the war.

    “The U.S. should support a just peace in Ukraine, based on the principles of territorial integrity, sovereignty, and international law,” Sanders wrote in the letter.


    The original article contains 244 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 34%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @yumcake@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Supporting Ukraine IS anti-war.

    It’s a war of aggression and the fastest and ONLY way to stop such a war is to stop the aggressor. Appeasement simply allows the aggressor to continue perpetuating or expanding their war aims.

    The waste is trickling arms to them instead of surging it. We need decisive Ukrainian victory to spare the lives of Ukrainians and Russians from Putin’s war.

  • halfempty
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    Why must every faction of Progressives attack each other. Bernie Sanders is the most solid progressive I know of, but Code Pink wants to attack him because his Ukraine support isn’t anti-war? I’m anti war. In particular I’m anti the war that Russia started by invading Ukraine. Anti war doesn’t mean just letting the bad guy do whatever they want. If so, then anti-war is pro tyranny, because they always let the aggressor invade.