“Boulder police are investigating the traffic signs as criminal tampering.”

“I appreciate the fact that it’s drawing attention to the fact that we’d like people to slow down and not be on their phones, but there’s probably, again, a few more appropriate ways about getting that message out.”

I’d love if they implemented whatever appropriate ways they have… then again they said appropriate, not effective.

  • Scrubbles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4417 hours ago

    I’ve been told by giant truck drivers that “kids shouldn’t have been in the street” and “where were the parents” in response to news stories of literal kids being run over. Fuck their “not appropriate messaging”, kids are dying and they’re worried they may not be able to put on their extra tall lift kit.

    Same thing with school shootings. “Oh it’s not appropriate to talk gun violence right after”. Well when the actual fuck is it okay, Martha? Maybe these people should feel a bit called out.

    • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      1516 hours ago

      “where were the parents”

      Oooh, that grinds my gears. We all know helicopter parenting is harmful for children, but people freak out whenever kids are outside without a helicopter parent. It reminds me of the mother who was arrested for letting their 10 year old be outside unsupervised (cops said it wasn’t safe for the kid to be outside on their own)

      • @refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        Like life in general, there has to be a balance.

        You can be not a helicopter while also teaching your kids not to go into the street.

      • @Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        55 hours ago

        Then those are the same people whining that kids are on their phones all day and never get exercise or go outside like “back in our day” 🙄

  • @Halasham@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    1815 hours ago

    Fuck decorum. I give negative damns about it given the extensive history of it being used as a shield to protect the facilitation of what amounts to mass murder. If dark skinned foreigners did ten percent the damage cars do we’d have used some of the nuclear arsenal but because it’s fucking profitable innocent people die every day and little, if anything, is done about its root causes.

    • @ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Hah, your 10% is terrifying realistic.

      Over 40,000 people die per year from motor accidents in the US.

      9/11 was 3k.

      But for some reason trying to convince people that we need to treat our car culture like an emergency of the utmost importance and priority the same way we would react to another country murdering random people like 9/11 and I’m being crazy.

      • @Halasham@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        16 minutes ago

        Just did some quick checking… it looks like the War on Terror as a whole averages well below the automotive catastrophe annually if we’re looking at even the broad anti-terrorism coalition.

        • Everyone comes out to 45k
        • Everyone but terrorist combatants cuts that to 30.5k
        • Cutting terrorist combatants and civilians brings that to 10k

        Brown University, death toll of the War on Terror

      • Laukidh
        link
        fedilink
        134 minutes ago

        @ericbomb remember when six people died from black market weed vapes and the government banned flavored e-cigs?

        • @ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          116 minutes ago

          Ugh we could probably talk all day about all the things the government intervened on for perceived dangers, and just ban something random to make it look like they addressed the thing.

          If I go up to a politician and say “I need your help to ban a product that has killed 20,000 people this year! Will you take my cause?”

          They’d act super enthusiastic until I say it’s private pick up trucks.

  • lnxtx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18 hours ago

    I hope they will have a good attorney and understanding judge.

  • @j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1317 hours ago

    There is probably some legality involved. Signs have more than informative meaning, where not pursuing this officially has broader ramifications.

    Just the unauthorized visual distraction factor can be used as a means of argument in court until the matter has precedent in case law established.

    • @ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      21 hour ago

      See if that was actually a standard for driving, I’d understand.

      But we have billboards, decorations, floppy men, people dancing on the side of the roads.

      If all that is allowed, I can’t really be offended by a sign saying “don’t kill people” as a form of protest.

    • @ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      11 hour ago

      I mean I’m never gonna hate on people who are peacefully/harmlessly protesting the amount of car deaths in the US.

      Now if they started slashing tires randomly I’d disagree.

      If they started slashing tires of people who killed/maimed another person from reckless driving, or regularly drives drunk and never got more than a slap on the wrist… well vigilantism is not something I will participate in at the current time. But I couldn’t judge them.

  • @pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 hours ago

    If this is nsfw then I wonder what the australian tac ads count as. (Literally showing people getting hit buy cars and flung up into there to there death)