@FUCKER@lemmy.world to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoUH OH!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down148
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imageUH OH!lemmy.world@FUCKER@lemmy.world to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square164fedilink
minus-squareTheFriar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·2 years agoEveryone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
minus-squareIronKrill@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoI assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.
Everyone here is saying this. Using Bing as an engine while maintaining peivacy doesn’t seem as much of a problem to me. Can you explain why pointing out that bing being under the hood is seen as a negative?
I assume because Bing gives the exact same spam results as Google. All of the seatch engines kinda suck nowadays.