• @FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well how far back are we talking? 200,000 years or just since writing was invented. Technically those cave paintings from tens of thousands of years ago could be telling historic events of some kind but if we even just say “only since 5000BCE” and only consider events of significant historic consequence shaping any given region (as opposed to neighbors starting a blood fued by shitting in each others yurts), then it’s STILL probably like 90% lost which is just wild.

    • @trailing9@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Is it history and not ancient times if it is not recorded?

      I would like to add:

      Imagine all of the recorded history that was destroyed.

    • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I had a thought about this on a toke and walk. Imagine all the artisans over the course of human existence. All the skills and tricks they learned to just exist and live. Like a hunter tieing the ends of their bow in a slightly different way so it would work better with what they had, or a cook who figured out a more interesting way to make pasta or something. All that is just lost to the sands of time. That’s okay, humanity is struggling along just fine. Still left me wondering, what do we not know?

  • @AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    51
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Want to feel sadder? Humanity has existed on Earth in its current form for about 200,000 years.

    We’ve only had civilization for about 10,000.

    That means humans spent about 180,000 years throwing rocks, sticks, and presumably feces at each other in the dirt before we entertained the idea of working together for mutual benefit. With all of our present senses and capacities at our disposal.

    Just incase anyone ever wonders why it’s so difficult for humanity to do what’s best for itself. We only do what’s in our best interests after we’ve fully exhausted all the bad options several times over.

    • @BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      771 year ago

      that’s not really true. 10,000 years ago is about when we developed agriculture, stopped roaming as much, and started writing in some form that could survive the millennia, but we’ve been living and working together since long before we were ever recognizably human.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        391 year ago

        In addition, we keep pushing key invention dates back further and further as we discover more archaeological evidence. It’s quite possible we were doing human things long before we think we did.

        • @whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          This is another thing that seems really weird to me. The explosion of technological development in the last 300 years or so compared to the preceding several thousand is pretty wild.

            • aubertlone
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              One of my favorite memes in general, used to great effect here.

              What ______________ does to a mf

              But I mean… really tho!!

      • . 10,000 years ago is about when we developed agriculture, stopped roaming as much, and started writing in some form that could survive the millennia

        This is bias towards a specific type of societal structure.

        Lots of peoples with rich, complex and fascinating cultures continued to live successful nomadic lives for centuries past the introduction of agriculture.

      • @AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pre-agrarian humans had more in common with beasts than with us. We were basically just another migratory animal subject to the migration patterns of our prey and seasonal growth. We have had the misfortune to see what feral humans who survived in isolation behave like.

        The larger scale cooperation required for agriculture is when we began to diminish behaving as such.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dina_Sanichar

        We are products of our environments.

        • @Suspicious@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is the dumbest “im so smart and edgy” comment I’ve ever seen. what we call a feral human today haa zero relation to life in pre-agrarian societies, also the idea that people …going to places were food will be makes them mindless zombies is so ridiculous thatI don’t even know where to start

          20 minutes of looking into archeological sites will show you how complex and cooperative non-agrarian society’s were (I’m saying non here instead of pre because there are many instances of societies developing agriculture and then moving away from it due to various social/environmental factors)

          • Provoked Gamer
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah. People seem to forget that the people in our past are exactly the same as us. They had fun, loved each other, got upset, got happy, worked together. They just didn’t have the advancements we have. Just because they went where food was doesn’t make them any less human. What else were they gonna do? Starve? They needed to eat, and they didn’t know of any alternative reliable way of getting food besides hunting since they didn’t figure out farming yet.

    • @Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      We never stopped throwing feces and I guarantee we were more close to each other in prehistory than we are now. We’ve been waging war for as long as we could record it.

    • @TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      That’s what the authorities want you to think. They don’t consider anything civilized unless it’s suffering under their rule.

  • @Bread@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    The real problem we have now is that there is so much information, we cannot store it all. You can’t just throw things out either because you truly have no idea what seemingly worthless things we produce are going to be deemed of significant value later on.

    That old blurry photograph of your great aunt with a photo bomb of some random dude? It is the only photo of the zodiac killer. That random shitty video in portrait mode of you driving through your home town in Kansas is the only surviving footage of what used to exist there before the 2046 asteroid impact that wiped out the state.

    You just never know what truly matters until its gone.

    • @xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Data hoarder identified.

      This thinking is why my mother’s house is full of useless crap that she thinks belongs in a museum.

      What museum? The broken camera-chipped pottery-photographs of children museum?

        • @Bread@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Well I won’t argue that you were incorrect. I do have hoarder tendencies and I “manage” that by keeping it only digital. That being said, I think my point still stands because despite my more ridiculous examples this does still happen.

          Lost classic TV show episodes that were thought lost to time are found again because of hoarders. Historical data on towns are kept by the person who has never thrown out a newspaper. Hoarding is bad, but it does prove to be useful on rare occasions. The fine line is saving potential chunks of history vs a stack of pizza boxes because they may have a use one day as storage.

          You may take a hard no on the matter because of what you have dealt with what your mother is going through, but I argue there is some specific things worth saving.

    • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Reminds me of the blurry video that may or may not be the only footage of Nick Drake.

      It would be awesome to find that someone took a camera over to the studio and the reel has been laying in an attic for 50 years.

      He’s the only artist who I admire so deeply and I can’t connect with him at all outside of his art. With other artists that I admire, I can see their mannerisms and personality if I want to. His is lost to time except through his music and stories from family and friends.

  • @Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Sometimes, when hiking, I’ll see something incredible, and when I go to capture it in a photo, it just doesn’t come out the same.

    Those vistas are allllll for me

    • PhreakyByNature
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Glowworm Caves yesterday, many sunsets, the impact of the view of rolling hills on your eyes vs recorded etc.

      • @Blapoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Agreed. Partially. I find myself looking back at pics and experiencing something much different.

        Similarly, I can retrace a route again and see things I completely missed before. Memory is fun :)

  • @Wage_slave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    And you are ultimately going to die as part of that 90% that won’t be remembered for anything at all no matter how big of a deal you view yourself in any form function or manner.

    Me too. It won’t be so bad. Unless they check the hard drive. Oh buddy then we’re historically remembered. Like, that’s a lotta porn.

    • @grahamja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      The thought of having your digital foot print live on forever was kind of neat, but most of it wasn’t worth remembering or will probably get deleted after a few decades anyways. Future generations will ever know about the witty banter on yahoo answers.

    • 7bicycles [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Oh buddy then we’re historically remembered. Like, that’s a lotta porn.

      That ain’t special

  • @Uniquitous@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Anyone who has ever had to dig through an overly verbose log file is fine with this. 90% of what happens is tediously mundane.

  • @kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Eh, I’m not sure as much is truly lost as one might currently think.

    There’s a number of things that seem more like an issue of history as a field having challenges in undue influence of academic popularity contests and subspecialty isolation.

    For example, the face of the historical basis for Helen of Troy has likely been on modern magazine covers, we just haven’t broadly realized it because most modern historians throw out Herodotus wholesale so they’ve ignored the details in his version of the Helen narrative, which happens to connect the events to part of Egypt’s history that’s been similarly poorly evaluated by scholarship to date.

    Even the way Homer and the Trojan War narrative gets handled is pretty ass backwards, with scholars preferring to just hand wave it as mythological history rather than seeing it as having combined a history of the Mycenaean conquest of Anatolia in the LBA with a later sea peoples capture of Wilusa back from the Hittites in the EIA (it has rather impressive levels of detail around events tied to both these things).

    We see modern debates about whether the Exodus narrative occurred or not as described in the Bible but there’s very little investigation into the Greek and Egyptian accounts of the same which differ significantly from the Biblical version (notably about it being ethnocentric), even claiming the latter version was altered. Versions that might be quite relevant to recent archeological finds like the Aegean style pottery with local clay in Tel Dan or the imported bees from Anatolia in Tel Rehov.

    Give it time. A lot of big topics that are generally dismissed or thought to be lost today might not still seem that way within a generation or two.

  • yes but how much of that history is important? no doubt its still the majority, but i suspect that some of that 90% you mention is just some random irrelevant persons life. i should also mention that i am not a historian nor a statistics person so take what i say with a grain of salt.

      • @BluesF@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I would say considering homo sapiens have been around for ~250,000 years we need a lot of decimal places… if you want to consider prior homo species that’s 2.8 million years and honestly you might as well call it 100%.

  • Provoked Gamer
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    What’s more awful? Most of the history we know is biased in favour of the winners.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      There’s lots of sources from the losing side. Josephus was a Jewish writer who told of the Roman destruction of the temple. The history of the Eastern Front of WWII, as it was known to the West, was dominated by the writings of German soldiers for a long time.

      History is written by writers. For much of it, that means it comes to us from an educated upper class. That’s where the historical blind spots are.

      • I take issue with describing Josephus as a part of the ‘losing’ side. Josephus had defected and was working as an interpretor for Titus while Titus was conducting the seige on Jerusalem in 70 AD. He took on the Roman emperor’s family name, Flavius. He firmly sits on the ‘winning’ side, with the Romans.

        Plus later on Christian’s were the ones copying his books, not Jews, since he was viewed as a turncoat by his own people. So his books were preserved by the ‘winning’ side as well.

        Not saying he should be completely disregarded or written off as a historian, just that he wasn’t part of any ‘losing’ side of history.

    • I think not having it recorded in any way is worse. At least if something is recorded you can examine and study and compare the accounts to get an inkling of what may have actually happened or see where the truth has been stretched.

  • Gnome Kat
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    Life isn’t worth living just because it will be written down, so what if no one remembers, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

  • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “In a way [my undertaking] is an entirely original science. In fact, I have not come across a discussion along these lines anywhere. I do not know if this is because people have been unaware of it…[but] perhaps [people] have written exhaustively on this topic, and their work did not reach us… The knowledge that has not come down to us is, after all, larger than the knowledge that has. Where are the sciences of the Persians…the Chaldaeans, the Syrians, the Babylonians…the Copts and their predecessors? The sciences of only one people, the Greeks, have come down to us…as for the sciences of others, nothing remains.”

    Ibn Khaldun, 1332-1406 (as translated by Rosenthal)

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    In 150 years historians will be lamenting that we recorded everything we did and now they have to sift through terrabytes of memes, pointless arguments, and outright misdirection to get at anything resembling truth.