Google likely alters queries billions of times a day in trillions of different variations. Here’s how it works. Say you search for “children’s clothing.” Google converts it, without your knowledge, to a search for “NIKOLAI-brand kidswear,” making a behind-the-scenes substitution of your actual query with a different query that just happens to generate more money for the company, and will generate results you weren’t searching for at all. It’s not possible for you to opt out of the substitution. If you don’t get the results you want, and you try to refine your query, you are wasting your time. This is a twisted shopping mall you can’t escape.

  • @theluddite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    439 months ago

    That sucks, but I argue that it’s even worse. Not only do they tweak your results to make more money, but because google has a monopoly on web advertising, and (like it or not) advertising is the main internet funding model, google gets to decide whether or not your website gets to generate revenue at all. They literally have an approval process for serving ads, and it is responsible for the proliferation of LLM-generated blogspam. Here’s a thing I wrote about it in which I tried to get my already-useful and high-quality website approved for ads, complete with a before and after approval, if you’re curious. The after is a wreck.

      • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        As someone with no web experience beyond using a string of notepad documents renamed into html files, this is both horrifying and completely fascinating. And very well written, like ya said.

    • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      Thank you for linking that excellent article. I’m finna share that with a bunch of people I know, because it’s wildly relevant to… lots of our lives.

      Bonkers that it so suddenly is becoming this shitty

    • @notfarenough
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      At this point Bing is starting to look pretty good.

  • no banana
    link
    fedilink
    English
    239 months ago

    That explains why I’m getting very odd specific results.

  • @xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    179 months ago

    If accurate, this is a perfect example of the principle of ‘enshitification’ in action. That is, a good service or product becoming increasingly terrible as its development is continuously perverted by revenue related incentives.

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      Indeed, it has the hallmark feature of enshittification: screwing over one party (the users) to benefit another (the advertisers), followed by screwing over the second party as well. I’m sure no advertiser wants to waste their ad budget showing ads to people who haven’t indicated any interest in their product; if they wanted to spend their money that way, they’d have bought ads on the more generic search terms instead.

  • @lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    169 months ago

    >search
    >search with search term in quotes
    >search with search term in quotes with “Verbatim” mode enabled
    >“search” “with” “each” “individual” “word” “of” “search” “term” “in” “quotes”
    >double-check that “Verbatim” mode is still enabled (it is)
    >click first link out of frustration, do a manual text search of the page for some keywords from your search term
    >keywords from search term are not in top search result
    >try to find a cached version of the page that that search engine appears to be referencing (waste 20 mins)
    >cached version also doesn’t contain any keywords from your search term

    iT’s ThE aLgOrItHm

    • @Nommer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      109 months ago

      DDG gives me better search results now. I was arguing with someone a few years back about how Google gives better results when searching for programming answers. Not anymore. I pretty much only use Google out of desperation when other searches failed.

      • @Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        DDG also ignores “sentences marked by quotes” and sometimes -negative search terms.

  • @query@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    People shouldn’t be paying to opt out of ads, websites should be paying their users for what they’re exploiting them for.

  • @DingoBilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    89 months ago

    It’s interesting how companies go through this loop of making a good product, making it even better until they become massive, then productively becoming shit and allowing the next company to come in and take their spot.

    At this point Google is becoming more and more of a joke.

  • @CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    I’m genuinely interested in trying out Kagi, it seems like a much better experience than whatever Google has to offer. With SEO being implemented everywhere it has gotten quite annoying that every time I search for something the first 5 results are some AI generated website that copies information from other sites.

      • @CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        I genuinely want to but I hate subscriptions simply because I’m poor at managing them which is why I’ve stuck with Google all this time.

    • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      I’ve recently found Qwant which I can recommend trying out. It’s a European search engine with it’s own index, independent from Google or Bing, privacy focused and free. The search results are pretty good, not sure if that’s because it’s just not affected by SEO focusing on Google.

      The biggest issue I have with all of the alternatives is that Google Maps is just so much better than anything and integrating Maps results is extremely useful. Qwant integrates with OpenStreetMap but obviously that’s just not the same.

      • @herr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Qwant is unfortunately owned by Axel Springer, truly one of the worst German companies in existence. They’re the publisher of the most popular (and unfortunately highly politically biased, filled to the brim with dishonest exaggerations and occasionally straight-up lies) German newspaper Bild.

        Whatever comes out of Qwant if it actually becomes popular, you can rest assured it will be nothing good.

        Just use DuckDuckGo and be done with it.

        • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          As much as I dislike Axel Springer, they seem to own just 20% of Qwant.

          In my experience DDG kinda sucks, when I gave it a honest try (~1 month of having it as default) I kept going back to Google too much.

          I don’t have any trouble dumping services when they go bad. I’m on Lemmy after all.

  • Engywuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    Ah, shit… If only different search engines existed… /s

    We all know that google is scummy/shit. Use something else instead of pretending to be shocked.

  • @Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    Good fucking luck getting at my wallet - I don’t think I’ve ever bought anything from ads. Also, I avoid Google whenever possible.

  • plz1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -59 months ago

    I think this is the 8th time this has been posted in the last week…