Not_mikey@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoThe blue line is getting thinnerslrpnk.netimagemessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1719arrow-down117
arrow-up1702arrow-down1imageThe blue line is getting thinnerslrpnk.netNot_mikey@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square102fedilink
minus-squareAnti-Face Weapon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·5 months agoThey would say it’s because police are getting better at their jobs or something
minus-squareRolder@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·5 months agoOr maybe that fewer police = fewer crimes being caught and tracked for statistic purposes
minus-squaredontgooglefinderscultlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoCrimes aren’t tracked by completion rate, just by report. While staffing rates might be down, that wouldn’t affect total number of crimes reported as nearly all people are covered by third party 911 service.
minus-squareAnti-Face Weapon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 months agoBut you see that would be an intelligent argument. That’s not the kind of argument these people make.
minus-squareRolder@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoThey also don’t vote intelligently either, apparently…
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months ago…and if they can day that with a straight face, give them an Oscar! (I say this as a kiwi looking from afar)
They would say it’s because police are getting better at their jobs or something
Or maybe that fewer police = fewer crimes being caught and tracked for statistic purposes
Crimes aren’t tracked by completion rate, just by report. While staffing rates might be down, that wouldn’t affect total number of crimes reported as nearly all people are covered by third party 911 service.
But you see that would be an intelligent argument.
That’s not the kind of argument these people make.
They also don’t vote intelligently either, apparently…
…and if they can day that with a straight face, give them an Oscar!
(I say this as a kiwi looking from afar)