A satellite belonging to multinational service provider Intelsat mysteriously broke up in geostationary orbit over the weekend.

  • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 minutes ago

    I’m honestly happy to see that it just had a fuel malfunction instead of the implication of an outside cause…

  • @ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 hour ago

    Wouldn’t it be a bit more concerning if it exploded into smaller, yet complete satellites…? Exploding “into pieces” seems downright SOP to me.

  • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    026 minutes ago

    Wow, Boeing keeps finding new and interesting ways to be incompetent. They seriously need their entire C-suite replaced with engineering types.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    94
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    That’s actually quite impressive because most satellites just don’t do anything when they die. Boeing’s vehicles die with flare, and depressing regularity

    • @yogurt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 hours ago

      That’s only because they’re designed with passivation to vent tanks and disconnect batteries to remove sources of explosion when they start to die. If that fails the tanks eventually pop from thermal cycling or the solar panels overcharge the battery until it blows up like a Russian satellite did earlier this year.

    • @SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 hours ago

      This is actually a real problem more so in this case than most. There’s an awful lot of satellites in low Earth orbit, altitude of a few hundred to several hundred kilometers. Atmospheric drag still exists here a little bit, and thus space junk will reenter and burn up in years or decades.

      This satellite was in geostationary orbit, at an altitude of about 36,000 km. Debris up there can take hundreds of years to come down. Geostationary is a special altitude where the satellite orbits at exactly the same rate as the Earth spins. That means that a fixed dish on Earth will always point at the satellite without needing to move or track. So there’s just one narrow orbital ring around the equator for that. That ring is not a place we want space junk to be, because if it gets too hazardous for satellites in GEO that basically removes our capability as a species to use fixed satellite dishes for anything. And that problem won’t go away for centuries.

    • @Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 hours ago

      How did it break up? I wasn’t aware that Boeing was determined to be a fault in the build process.

      • @Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 hours ago

        Yeah fair point. Boeing has a degraded reputation these days but at the mo we don’t know why it broke up. Probably never will. I’m kinda going on Occam’s razor here.

  • @lunar17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4214 hours ago

    This is slightly concerning. Satellites don’t tend to explode on their own, but it is a Boeing design with a history of leaky propulsion, so who knows?

    • @postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Sure it was a Comm satellite for the world’s tensest area, which is about to go to bigger war.

      who would have ASAT capability at GEO?

      how could it be launched to GEO undetected?

      • @Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2910 hours ago

        If you’re a government, you can pretty much put anything in a rocket fairing and call it a reconnaissance satellite.

        The only warning that actually has to be given is that a rocket is being launched, so you don’t accidentally trigger WW3 by setting off launch detection satellites without warning. After it’s in space, no one can really tell what was in the fairing. Could be a spy satellite, could be navigation. Could just be a box with a bunch of little rockets in it, designed to slam into whatever you want at ridiculous speed.

        But it’s way more likely that this was just Boeing having a tiny leak in a propellant tank, or a bad thruster and as soon as the concentration of propellant and oxidizer got high enough, it triggered a detonation. They certainly have a history of not leak testing their shit: airplanes falling apart, space capsules with leaky thrusters, and now a blown up satellite point more towards incompetence than malice.

  • @Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2214 hours ago

    Rapid unscheduled disassembly.

    Plus “Into pieces” is rather unnecessary there.

  • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    did you know that high powered lasers are invisible to the naked eye without a sufficient particulate medium to pass through?

    • GHiLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2613 hours ago

      Good thing I’m wearing clothes.

  • @clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3416 hours ago

    Boeing: outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer and so on and still has the shamelessness of appearing surprised at the shit quality and reliability they deliver