flamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 个月前Maths rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square47linkfedilinkarrow-up1321arrow-down116
arrow-up1305arrow-down1imageMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeflamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 个月前message-square47linkfedilink
minus-squarePoik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 个月前Nope, it means “for any” as in no matter which one you choose it will be correct.
minus-squaredriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 个月前https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
minus-squarePoik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 个月前I sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.
Nope, it means “for any” as in no matter which one you choose it will be correct.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification
I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
I sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.