Photo of a persons’ torso wearing a t-shirt that says: maybe a bunch of white slave owners from the 1700’s did not come up with the best government ever
If they just used a better election format, that could have fixed so much. I don’t think they envisioned such a large population. More than two parties can work at small scale but fails at large scale. And getting that changed is such a task I’m not even sure how it could happen right now.
https://kbin.social/m/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com/t/248125/They-wrote-the-rules-playing-within-them-will-never-set
I think it’s actually easier than it may seem. Iirc states get to pick what election system they use to send representatives to Congress. If a single larger state switches to PR and a third party wins a few seats, they could instantly become a kingmaker if the house is divided.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
I think that would allow a “better” democracy in paper, but not much would change. Using my country as an example:
- One person, one vote, voting is mandatory, if you don’t vote you have to pay penalties and lose access to many government services. Businesses are required to give time off for voting. Elections are so fragmented that in the last one a person with 15% of the total votes won. People voted for they in second round only because they were the lesser of two evils.
Candidats are still shit, evil persons that only care about using the government to enrich themselves (and have a history of doing so), most of the population are so bad educated that they only need to hear a few promises to vote for them.
-
Not implemented. Would be specially nice for the fragmentation.
-
We only have congress. Still corrupt, still holds most of the power, uses it to gain money through laws that benefit them and their businesses. It is very fragmented, but it doesn’t matter, because they join when they need to pass a law that benefits them. Leaders of the political parties decide which laws to pass, and tell the congresspeople how to vote. If someone does’t vote as they are told, they are removed from congress.
And to get to congress you have to bribe a lot of money to a lot of people, so no one would self destruct after getting in debt before realizing some earnings.
-
Supreme court justices are not permanent, last only 5 years, no reelections, appointed by congress. So what? Just do the things that need to be done during your 5 years. After that the new congress will place new puppets. If a major scandal is revealed, you’ll be protected by congress, allowed to leave the country with all your money, and forgotten in a few years.
-
Bribes are illegal, lobbying is illegal. We did it Patrick! Bribery is no more! You can just get money off the table. However, here the opposite is argued. Congresspeople and the president should have the highest salaries, so that they wouldn’t have incentives to take bribes (they earn so much, why risk it to get more). But even if they were
… but if even if they were to earn minimum wage, they can just, you know, take bribes? Just don’t tell anyone about it. Or pass laws that benefit them.
Removed by mod
Such changes only serve to maintain the status quo by giving people the illusion of progress while capitalism continues to ravage the planet and it’s inhabitants
They probably did considering the unprecedented, massive and voluntary migration of people from all over the world into said country.
Lmfao “voluntary” as if the US isn’t one of the biggest contributors to other places being poor and/or wartorn.
Never mind the marginalisation that those who aren’t white (or even white “enough”) or abled or cis or straight or christian experience.
gtfoh
That’s because they didn’t have enough guns
The blatant failures of the current system have become the benefits for the ruling class. That’s why they won’t ever change it. It’s like a broken vending machine that no one will admit is broken because they keep getting free candy out of it.
Except the system isn’t failing because it isn’t broken. It’s working exactly as designed.