In illegally occupied Hawaii, the goal has always been genocide of the indigenous. The UN needs to kick the USA out of Hawaii.
check out all the colonizer scumbags downvoting you
Not just downvoting. Have you seen these comments? The brain rot never ceases to amaze me.
indeed, reddit migration brought over some of the most deplorable people here
This is dumb bullshit. stfu, idiot.
Empire lover spotted
This is why instances defederate from you morons. Blocked.
Blocked.
I don’t understanding this new thing of bragging about being fragile but in the tone of a tough guy
It’s not new. It’s what
melodramatically do in local chat all the time in online games.
you know what’s even better, go back to the reddit cesspool whence you came from
lol, no, bitch, get over it
lol yeah gtfo colonizer
How’s this dumb? They’re correct. The US is illegally occupying Hawaii and persecutes the indigenous to that end.
I get the feeling you just like licking imperialists’ boots.
“All these Hexbear posters are so rude, they never say anything of substance, they just insult you”
shut the fuck up colonizer
good, those meltdown videos are quality content
Your meltdown comments are quality content.
thanks, appreciated, blocked
It’s too bad you never found out that announcing blocks only makes you look more pissy and pompous.
Wow, what inciteful and valuable commentary you’ve added.
It’s not worth the trouble. I’ve lost friends and will be helping others rebuild. Whatever you think is irrelevant. Bye bye now.
dramatic fedora tip
Reddit has turned your brain to soup
Mahalo for your support
That’s it, just line yourselves up for me, like shooting fish in a barrel.
Shooting fish in a barrel is when I make myself look like an ass for the whole internet to see
Lmao, okay
yep, just keep lining up for me
Lemmygrad users are very creative at finding unexpected and loopy new ways to criticize the American government.
Remind me what’s loopy about pointing out that US occupies Hawaii and genociding the native population there colonizer?
deleted by creator
Major “both sides” vibes
deleted by creator
Feature not a bug
deleted by creator
This is the best summary I could come up with:
HONOLULU (AP) — Residents who survived the wildfire that leveled the Hawaii town of Lahaina might not be able to afford to live there after it is rebuilt unless officials alter the zoning laws and make other changes, economists warned Friday.
Soaring housing prices have already forced many Native Hawaiians and other longtime Hawaii residents to leave the islands and move to the U.S. mainland.
The wildfire that claimed at least 97 lives and destroyed 2,200 buildings in the West Maui community of Lahaina — 86% of which were residential — amplifies that problem for the survivors.
A spike in housing costs would be a further burden for people — including retirees and those who worked in restaurants, hotels and shops — who lost their homes and jobs when their places of employment burned to the ground on Aug. 8, or when West Maui temporarily closed to tourism after the disaster.
At a news conference on Thursday at the state Capitol, Green stressed that the displaced survivors won’t be forced out of hotels to make room for tourists, with October typically being a slow month for tourism.
“Outsiders should not have the opportunity to grab land or properties because emotions are running high, so everyone is vulnerable,” Melody Lukela-Singh, whose home on Lahaina’s renowned Front Street burned, said recently.
The original article contains 817 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is something to keep an eye on from this disaster. I hope some good policy and solutions get put in place to get proper housing back in place for the working locals.
Did they not have insurance? Shouldn’t they have ample money to rebuild? I don’t understand.
deleted by creator
Maybe you should read the article before you make stupid comments?
I’m so sorry my questions upset you. Have you tried not being butthurt?
Your questions didn’t upset me; they’re answered plainly in the article you’re responding to.
The issue isn’t people who own the property not being able to rebuild, the issue is people who were renting there likely being unable to afford to rent there after it’s rebuilt, because the prices were previously low due to the age of the buildings, and it’s almost entirely not zoned for multi-family dwellings.
If you aren’t even going to read the article you’re talking about, how are we supposed to interpret your questions, if not as being stupid?
Don’t feed the trolls.
