• @Syldon@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1510 months ago

    Might be an idea to start making media funding a lot more open. GB news is obviously not making a profit.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      That’s it, the article is part of the Guardian’s Australian arm but the harm he has done is there, here in the UK and especially in the US. It would be bad enough if he’d wrecked one country but he has tilted the debate across the English-speaking world.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    610 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Murdoch’s outlets, including Fox News, the Wall Street Journal and The Australian, have long been known to promote doubts about the cause and consequences of the climate crisis.

    UK thinktank the Institute for Strategic Dialogue described Murdoch’s Sky News Australia as a global hub for spreading climate change misinformation.

    In a foreword to a 2022 company environment report, Murdoch wrote News Corp was “filled with people who are creative and collaborative, and possessing an abiding sense of curiosity about the world around us”.

    Fox Corporation announced on Friday that the former Australian prime minister Tony Abbott, who has repeatedly said he does not accept mainstream climate science and whose government repealed carbon price legislation, had been nominated for a board position.

    Rupert Murdoch’s son Lachlan, who is set to become the sole chair of Fox and News Corp after his father’s retirement, said Abbott had “skills, experience and perspectives” that would benefit the company.

    Dr Peter Gleick, a co-founder of the California-based Pacific Institute, said Murdoch was responsible for pushing “decades of dangerous climate misinformation and denial to millions of people”.


    The original article contains 900 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!