• @Ace0fBlades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    651 year ago

    They don’t want to compromise battery in favor of performance and I agree. With smaller games like Hades or cult of the lamb my steam deck battery will last and last. On more demanding games like cyberpunk or Armored Core I get a little over an hour out of it best case scenario.

    Beefier graphics hardware will only make that issue worse.

    • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I so often use mine plugged in as I’m not walking or in a park, I’m on a bus or train which can often have a plug, so not much of an issue there, however I’m not playing high-end games, it’s so good for stuff like Hades and whatnot.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Personally I don’t plan on playing big games like these on the go anyway, so battery life isn’t going to be a problem.

      I was thinking of getting a docking station with an m.2 slot for those bigger games to play when I’m home.

    • @Gamey@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Only waiting for new generations of GPUs and CPUs can help there I guess, those usually push things a lot in a performance per wat comparison!

    • P03 Locke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      They don’t want to compromise battery in favor of performance and I agree

      The battery life is already 5 seconds. No need to make the problem worse.

  • @RxBrad
    link
    English
    51
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @clanginator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Exactly. I’d like to see a few significant improvements for the next gen - namely in screen and performance to match, but my dream would be to see Valve license Framework’s module system (or build something similar of their own) and integrate one of those somewhere on the deck.

      It’d be great for the obvious, like adding high-speed storage, but just imagine the possibilities for a handheld gaming console of attachments people could build with a module system that locks in place like that.

      Obviously the module thing is a pipe dream and unlikely to happen, but I just feel like there’s a ton of additional potential for that form factor that’s unexplored, and I’d like to see longer generations not only for support, but also so that larger iterative work like designing a module system or whatever can be prioritized over rushing out regular performance upgrades.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    I’m not in a rush, and stable specs makes it easier for devs to get their games to work and Valve to improve Proton.

    The next version is definitely on my radar, but for now my desktop works well enough.

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fine by me, just keep supporting the Steam Deck and being awesome. Love you Valve!

  • @caut_R@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The thing that made me reconsider buying one is the screen. Make an OLED version and I‘m gonna get one. I‘m not worried about the performance, I‘d get a deck for stuff like Dead Cells and Spelunky, not for stuff like Cyberpunk.

    If they made an OLED version and offered replacement screens for burn-in cases in x years, that‘d be absolutely amazing.

  • @echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Kinda wonder what kind of effect a more powerful nintendo device will have on the whole ecosystem. Nintendo devices are automatically probably going to run smoother watt for watt just because developers will likely prioritize optimisation for that device, so it’s all a bit of an uphill battle for the steam deck there

    • @Gamey@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Nintendo never makes anyhow powerful devices, they juat rely wntirely on developer optimization and only certain dwvelopers are willing to put in the time well and money to publiah for their propriatary and expensive frameworks in the first place.

      • @echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago
        • famicom: very competitive at the time, advanced in some areas
        • snes: very competitive, more powerful in many regards
        • n64: widely accepted as the most powerful of that generation
        • gamecube: more powerful than ps2
        • wii: this one is the least powerful you have that.
        • wiiu: widely accepted as more powerful than x360/ps3
        • switch: powerful hardware for a handheld of the time.
        • rumoured switch successor: rumored to basically be a portable ps4.

        Your theory does not hold water. And it is full of typos. You need a better mobile keyboard.

        • @Chailles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I can’t really comment on the earlier consoles, but those are some pretty biased comparisons.

          The GameCube is more powerful than the PS2, but then the Xbox was more powerful than the GameCube. Then you have the Wii. But then WiiU being more powerful than a console coming out 6 years prior? What kind of argument is that?

          The argument for the Switch doesn’t prove anything when there’s very little investment in the handheld console market when the Switch came out. And also, who cares if the Switch’s successor can beat a decade old console? I swear, my phone probably can run a PS4 game based purely on its processing power.

        • @Gamey@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The WiiU wasn’t more powerful than the competition but the old ones where, they gave up on compeating in terms of specs with the Wii and the Swit h uses a mobile processor that was old and slow even when it came out and can easily be surpassed by most phones if it wasn’t for the insane optimisation. They continue to proof that games matter more than specs and that’s a very profitable and well working strategy so idk where you got those rumors from but I am 99% sure the next switch will have a relatively slow ARM processor again and there is nothing wromg with that if it’s enough fun, it just requires a lot of work from the game developers that not all of them are willing to put in. About the typos, no keyboard in the world can fix my drunken typing and I am fairly happy with mine but thanks for the suggestion I guess…

        • @averyfalken@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          The switch 2 is rumored to be more powerful than the ps4 an old console at this point in time that also had relatively seeker hardware than it could or should of at the time (same with Xbox the and jaguar cores were not that good)

  • @GillyGumbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I’m holding off until a new version. Doesn’t necessarily need to be faster, but I’m sure they’ve learned a ton with this release. Interested to see their 2.0 release.

    • @Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Only thing I would ever want more is battery, but I’ve never even drained it and I carry my power brick with me everywhere for my phone/ laptop anyway so. I’d just get this version on the next discount (if I did not have a similar device).

  • TeoTwawki
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just want a slightly higher res screen. Not by much just a bit more. Thats all