Scientists suffering insults and mass-spam are abandoning Twitter for alternative social networks as hostile climate-change denialism surges on the platform following Elon Musk's takeover.

Researchers have documented an explosion of hate and misinformation on Twitter since the Tesla billionaire took over in October 2022 – and now experts say communicating about climate science on the social network on which many of them rely is getting harder.

Policies aimed at curbing the deadly effects of climate change are accelerating, prompting a rise in what experts identify as organised resistance by opponents of climate reform.

Peter Gleick, a climate and water specialist with nearly 99,000 followers, announced on May 21 he would no longer post on the platform because it was amplifying racism and sexism.

While he is accustomed to “offensive, personal, ad hominem attacks, up to and including direct physical threats”, he told AFP, “in the past few months, since the takeover and changes at Twitter, the amount, vituperativeness, and intensity of abuse has skyrocketed”.

  • GhostfaceEnglish
    29•3 months ago

    Are they being encouraged to move to mastodon?

    This would be q great time to provide thw fediverse

    • @chobeat@lemmy.ml
      1•3 months ago

      Bonfire, with its direct support for OpenScience features, would be a better alternative

  • @agegamon@beehaw.org
    16•3 months ago

    Honestly I’m shocked at the number of people that stayed on twitter. Like… just why? It’s zero effort to leave and minimal effort to find another platform.

    I realize many people choose not to care who owns the companies that make their stuff. And to be fair, sometimes it’s actually worse to throw away the product than keep using it despite the associated image. I still daily drive my Tesla model 3 that I bought in 2019. Throwing away a car creates a shitload of waste, versus just continuing to drive it. I’d never buy another tesla, which solves that issue.

    But unlike throwing out a car or even throwing out something with actual value like youtube, ditching Twitter as far as I see has no downside.

    • @epidemian@lemmy.ml
      2•3 months ago

      ditching Twitter as far as I see has no downside.

      I’m curious: have you ever liked Twitter?

      Because i could understand not seeing any downside to leaving a site if one has never actually liked it. But, many people liked (and still like) Twitter. I personally have known many interesting people there, and even started some nice in-person friendships. I don’t like at all what’s become of Twitter; i have it now blocked through the LeechBlock extension so i don’t fall into doom/shit scrolling. But i think there’s still some good in there. I can totally understand how many people would find it difficult to fully leave; myself included.

  • @Hirom@beehaw.org
    15•3 months ago

    Scientists don’t have to explain why they’re leaving twitter. The reasons should be obvious to anyone familiar with Twitter.

    Journalists need to explain why they’re still on Twitter, given that platform has so much bots, trolls, hate and lack moderation.

  • @criitz@reddthat.com
    12•3 months ago

    vituperative
    /vī-too͞′pər-ə-tĭv, -tyoo͞′-, -pə-rā″-, vĭ-/

    adjective
    Using, containing, or marked by harshly critical or irate language.

  • @Asafum@feddit.nl
    11•3 months ago

    Musk won of course…

    As usual billionaires buy get their way. Too many people that aren’t brainwashed “conservatives” on there for his liking so he took it over and now look at where we are…

  • @ulkesh@beehaw.orgEnglish
    3•3 months ago

    Anyone with a modicum of intelligence should leave Twitter. It is a cesspool of degenerates now. Best to let it fester and die.