• vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    That can’t be true. If targeting you was a rational decision someone else would have targeted you a long time ago.

      • moody
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe you were just collateral damage

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I did just wake up - wouldn’t this be a right shift in targeting curve? Lower cost of targeting me is a supply side change.

          At any specific cost to target there is an increased quantity willing to accept that cost?