An exceptionally well explained rant that I find myself in total agreement with.

  • underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 年前

    Whether or not they’re violating the letter of the GPL is entirely separate from whether they’re violating its intent. The former is debatable but the latter is absolutely happening here.

    • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 年前

      What do you think the intent of the GPL is though? Genuinely curious, this isn’t meant as a retort or anything.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 年前

        … the freedom to study, change, and redistribute the software you use.

        They are specifically and explicitly trying to limit your freedom with regards to redistribution by making it a violation of their EULA to do so.

        • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          But the code is also available in CentOS Stream, which is basically the “git master” of RHEL, and that you can freely redistribute.