• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Why would you need to “root” it?

    You should just be able to just install from a unknown source

    Edit: you did

    • @oneguynick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -43 months ago

      Maybe it is just the circles I run, but any Android hacking/opening still carries the “rooting” connotation, even if it’s not the fundamental access rooting purely refers to.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13 months ago

        “Rooting” is kind of a silly term anyway. You don’t call using sudo rooting

        • @moody
          link
          English
          103 months ago

          Maybe you don’t.

  • @irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    That’s cool. I wonder if that violates any non commercial use licensing. Keeping in mind I don’t know what kind of license it is, just wondering since a fair amount of people know it off the top of their head.

    • @breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      Even if it had such a clause, what part of installing home entertainment software on your personal device counts as commercial use to you?

      • @irish_link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        I had originally made the comment prior to OP clarifying that it’s about rooting.

        I thought that NordicTrak was shipping them with Jellyfin and using it as the video feed for exercises to follow. Thus Commercial use.

        However looks like the GPLv2 is cool with it even if it was happening they way I had though.

    • qaz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s the GPLv2 which doesn’t disallow commercial usage.