seasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoInsurance Company Flew a Drone to Take Photos of Man's House and Canceled His Policypetapixel.comexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1270arrow-down15cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1265arrow-down1external-linkInsurance Company Flew a Drone to Take Photos of Man's House and Canceled His Policypetapixel.comseasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square79fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareMrMonkey@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·2 years agoThe same reason flying airplanes isn’t “criminal trespassing”. Satellite and aerial photography happen really high up. No insurance company used a small toy drone to fly 50’ over his property for pictures.
minus-squareBettyWhiteInHD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareMrMonkey@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoPeople downvote things they don’t want to be true. It’s strange. It doesn’t work that way.
minus-squareMatt Shatt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 years agoNot even if we downvote extra hard?
The same reason flying airplanes isn’t “criminal trespassing”. Satellite and aerial photography happen really high up.
No insurance company used a small toy drone to fly 50’ over his property for pictures.
deleted by creator
People downvote things they don’t want to be true.
It’s strange. It doesn’t work that way.
Not even if we downvote extra hard?