X revokes paid blue check from United Auto Workers after strike called::After a report called out Musk’s union-busting, UAW’s blue check got reinstated.

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      531 year ago

      At this point we just need a large compiled list of every instance of it. There’s so much that I can’t think of an example right away.

    • @db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Still not what free speech means.

      But baby trust fund dipshit is begging to get sued again.

      • @explore_broaden@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        521 year ago

        It’s not what free speech means, but they’re using his own words against him. Of course we clearly can’t expect any consistency from conservatives, “free speech for me” etc.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Elon Musk is an incompetent sociopathic scammer who got very lucky.

    He is not a great engineer, he’s a dumbass who got fired from his own company for being incompetent. When the company was bought he raked in the cash from the shares he had, that’s all. All his “great ideas” are face palmingly stupid.

    He’s petty and vengeful. When rescuers were risking their lives getting kids out of a cave denied his stupid idea, he called them a pedophile just because fuck you. That is musk in a nutshell.

    He doesn’t give a shit about anything or anybody but himself. He forces people to work in near slave like conditions. Do it or get fired and lose your house, or maybe deported. Unions? Fuck your unions, here is a chain lulz.

    He. Lies. About. Everything. Probably the only person worse than Trump when it comes to continuous lying. Every promise he made is bullshit. Tesla will… nope.

    He was the bright light behind the decision not to use flame diverters (standard tech from the 60’s) when his next SpaceX toy was launched, because it would take too much time to build and it would not be needed… a decision which utterly obliterated the launch platform, pelted even cars on a parking lot 5 kilometers away and polluted the entire surroundings. All because he needs to show the world how big his dick is. Then when the rocket blew up over Mexican territory (nice self destruct that didn’t even work) everyone cheered because rockets… should… Blow up? Oh yeah, that was by design. WTF?

    And as always, he just laughs it off and his fans laugh with him because “it’s Elon man, he’s cool! He walked in to Twitter with a kitchen sink!” And then proceeded to run the company he paid twice too much for into the ground, it now being worth, what? 30% from what he paid? So like 15% from what it was actually worth? From the second he started he just did the stupid. Firing so many people without even checking if they were needed, causing people to be locked in the buildings, the blue check mark scandal… twitter (not X) is a shit show and will be bankrupt very soon as muskie won’t be able to afford to pay back the billions he had to borrow for his little toy.

    Fuck everything about this guy, may he step on a Lego every day he gets out of bed.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Right with ya, but I’m not seeing any of his fans online. Nada. I’m pretty sure they’re all but gone or deep in hiding.

      • @rororo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think you wouldn’t find them on Lemmy, it’s kind of an echo chamber here. I have a bunch of family that has Teslas and plans to get more Teslas because they’re “cool” and they either don’t care that Elon is behind it, or think he’s some kind of hero.

    • @locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -211 year ago

      What do you mean by “… twitter (not x) is a shit show …”?

      In April, Twitter merged into X Corp. and Twitter, Inc. ceased to exist. So I’m not sure if there’s some legal point you’re trying to make.

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Fuck that x bullshit.

        It’s not a legal pointe, it’s me refusing to dance to his bullshit fiddle. It’s why I dropped twitter ,(not x) completely

        • Kras Mazov
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          He can shove that X right up his autistic asshole.

          Elon can go fuck himself, but don’t use autism as an insult, ever.

            • Kras Mazov
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              When you say “his autistic asshole”, you’re using autism as an insult against him, which has absolutely nothing to do with why he’s a piece of shit. It’s extremely insensitive to do that.

                • Kras Mazov
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  What the fuck are you on about? I genuinely don’t follow. I explained twice now why what you said is problematic.

          • @teuast@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Yeah, but you know what he’s talking about, right? Why be so pedantic about it?

            • @locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              Yes, I do now. It’s similar to people that say “not my President”. It’s a way to state that you don’t like something that happened.

              I’ve since discovered that this is a red vs blue powered issue, which makes this discussion moot. Throwing rocks for any reason at the other color isn’t useful. I vote third party and stay out of red vs blue.

  • 🐱TheCat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    951 year ago

    Somewhere an Elon fanboy is explaining why this is peak free speech

    • @figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Excellent decision sir, human rights are overrated anyway

      • probably some blue check person
    • @etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      As an ex Elon fanboy let me literally honestly try the best I can here…

      The best I can come up with is, “Hi. Elon here. Revoking UAW’s blue check was just a joke. Get it? Humour! I can humourise with the best of them. Ha. Ha. Ha.”

    • @SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I mean technically it’s the free speech of Elon to do whatever with his company, right? Like how the Colorado photographer didn’t have to provide services to gays and how Amazon is no longer allowing BLM.

      • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        When the savior of humanity declared he was a “free speech absolutist” people misinterpreted his meaning.

        He meant that he should have absolute authority over who should have free speech.

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I mean technically it’s the free speech

        Legally, yes. Ethically, definitely no.

        How most of society uses that term is not in the legal way, but in the ethical way, which is a topic all on its own; a weird disconnect.

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            No ethics ir morals in a corporate world.

            Society is not just a corporation.

            • @Case@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Tell that to, I dunno, everyone else.

              They certainly think so.

              I’ve been wary of corporations since I first read Neuromancer.

              • Cosmic Cleric
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                Don’t believe the shill/fiction. Regular people know what the score is.

        • @seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          And you get these smooth-brain takes like “Only the government can take away your free speech” because people think that “freedom of speech” and “the First Amendment” are one and the same.

    • RaivoKulli
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Private platform. That was the argument before Elon took over, so I guess same works (or doesn’t) here.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Somewhere an Elon fanboy is explaining why this is peak free speech

      This gives off such a movie “It’s a Wonderful Life” vibe.

    • @Pohl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      It is free speech as I would define it. The UAW had decided foolishly to communicate on a platform run by and for right wing reactionaries. Those asshats are free to moderate however they like, it’s their platform.

      Stop using twitter you idiots! Using twitter gives legitimacy to the platform. The platform’s spreads nazi hate speech. What possible excuse does the UAW have for giving legitimacy to a nazi platform???

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        In the land of morons, I reasonable person reads the articles and finds this:

        To be fair, the Arstechnica article doesn’t mention this, the Intercept article that Arstechnica refers to does, and most people usually don’t read double article in deep before commenting.

    • @locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Who is struggling because UAW lost their blue check mark? I’m an X user. I’ve found my usage of the product generally uninterrupted and am confused by statements like this.

      • @Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        So you are ok supporting a platform that is actively taking the power away from organization helping people because it is a good experience? I mean you are on Lemmy, so you must have some sense to the issues surrounding centralized anything, especially media?

        • @locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          For me it’s a lot like paying taxes. No I’m not ok with it, but it’s required of me so I just coast along because revolting would not be worth it.

          As you say, I have no problem revolting against a platform over injustice (15y Redditor here, left when they did dirty).

          They removed a blue check mark. It’s petty. It’s stupid. It’s not revolution worthy imo.

      • @orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who is struggling because UAW lost their blue check mark?

        A: UAW

        I’m an X user. I’ve found my usage of the product generally uninterrupted and am confused by statements like this.

        A: Martin Niemöller

        • @BigNote@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          This is actually a win for UAW. They want to unionize Tesla’s workers, so any anti-union activity on Elon’s part just gives them more ammunition with the NLRB, which has strict rules regarding what ownership is allowed to say publicly. It plays directly into their hands.

          Also worth saying that the Biden NLRB is the most pro-union and labor-friendly in history.

        • @locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I didn’t realize that the blue check did anything meaningful that would make it so horrible.

          They didn’t put the UAW in a prison camp. Ffs I’m sorry but it’s a leap from blue check to prison camp.

          I’ve since discovered that this is a red vs blue powered issue, which makes this discussion moot. Throwing rocks for any reason at the other color isn’t useful. I vote third party and stay out of red vs blue.

          • @orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I always find it interesting, people assume the Nazis started with killing the Jews, the Gays, the Socialists, the “Degenerate” etc… as soon as they existed, but no, they didn’t, they had to work their way up to that. and some of the first things they did was work to delegitimize their opposition and keep them from speaking out.

            As for “I vote third party” good for you, you could just not go to vote, even if a 3ed party gains traction it will only serve as a spoiler to whoever that third party is closer aligned to.

            And for the “other color” bullshit, you need to have quite a bit of privilege to say this, after all, LGBTQ rights, woman’s rights, POC Rights, are all just a “blue vs. red” issue in America, but these issues decide on the rights of millions of people.

  • @Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    841 year ago

    It’s time to put some of these billionaires in their place. Nationalize his shit, seize his assets, and revoke his passport and citizenship. Fuck Musk, sick of his childish attention seeking bullshit.

  • Gnome Kat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    751 year ago

    Hey the auto workers are striking now… can we just like… do a general strike already?

    • @Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Sadly, it’s going to need to get a lot worse (it’s already worse) for most Americans to feel enough of the squeeze to care. Until then, the beatings will continue until moral improves…

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    581 year ago

    lol does he not realize that he has delegitimized any credibility his platform once held?

    I’m sure they do not care.

    • @BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      No, this is a straight up win for UAW. They are trying to unionize Tesla’s workers, so any anti-union activity on Elon’s part only plays into their hands at the NLRB level.

    • @Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s not that he doesn’t care. It’s the goal. Killing the credibility of social media is a top priority for authoritarians. They can’t have people talking to each other outside of the shaped narratives delivered by their media companies. That’s why companies spend so much on bot farms, shills and influencers. In order to shape public narratives when they can’t control the media.

    • @DRUMS_@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      “Oh no! My blue check!!” It’s not real and it’s not a display of power like he thinks.

        • @xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Yeah. I’m not famous at all, but I could imagine it would be troublesome trying to migrate a popular account with thousands of followers to another service.

          Even if you were successful, you’d probably only retain a quarter of your followers because most people can’t be ballsed to dl/sign up for another app.

          Half your followers on Twitter are probably bots or inactive anyhow, so take that as you will.

      • 🐱TheCat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        I’m not on twitter and never was, but I’m not silly enough to think billionaires don’t shape my world in a million fucking ways with their unilateral decisions. Elon here has a HUGE one recently in deciding to disable starlink during a Ukraine offensive.

        Trying to assist his rich buddies with fucking with the union is a lower tier crime but still its fuckery that affects a lot of people.

        Then we’ve got other rich asshats selling state secrets for money.

        Billionaires are a liability and everyone needs to realize it.

    • @BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      This is a win for UAW though. They are trying to unionize Tesla’s workers and this behavior gives them an edge on the already labor-friendly NLRB by showing that Elon is actively anti-union.

      If anyone thinks for a moment that union organizers don’t actively plan this kind of thing out, I can assure that they do. It’s part of their job description. My union is a lot smaller than UAW and our organizers get up to all kinds of subterfuge and shenanigans, so I can only imagine what the UAW people are doing.

    • @NotOverSeether@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      The biggest losers are the people who cannot read for more than 10 seconds at a time.

      This article was updated to include information about a Twitter policy to temporarily remove checkmarks from verified accounts that change their profile pictures.

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -481 year ago

      Yes removing a blue checkmark is exactly the same as being kidnapped off the street and sent to a work camp.

      • @kewjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        before the Nazi party came to power, they would show up to rallys, protests and town squares to silence political opponents through intimidation and physical violence.
        A lot of people would consider Twitter a modern day digital “Town square”. i would say it’s eerily similar, the main difference is that there’s no physical violence just the silence.

              • @zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Do you think community work is where people go preach?

                It’s setting up a neighborhood pantry, showing up to community meetings, rendering aide to my unhoused brethren, helping the local maker space setup an electronics lab. None of that involves preaching.

                And yes, the community work is going well. Does a lot to alleviate alienation under capitalism.

          • @orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            That worked out stellar for Weimar Germany, didn’t it?

            Unless you know nothing of the time before Hitlers rise to power and just how bloods it was.

              • @orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                you live in an interesting world, either you wait until some far right threat as built it’s self up and radicalized, or do exactly that, but this time try to shoot first.

                the whole idea of maybe there was a bunch of stuff leading up to the Nazis threatening to shoot you that you could intercede in, stopping the whole need for shooting in the first place apparently never crossed your mind.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t know if you know this, but there’s a big difference between how people act with anonymity and how they act in real life.

          There are definitely real Nazis. They are definitely bad guys. Removing a blue checkmark is not anywhere close to the same as people being deported to concentration camps in the literal Holocaust.

          Do you understand how ridiculous this sounds?

          Nothing is going to happen to any striking workers. No one is “coming” for the actual trade unionists.

          • @CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 year ago

            The thing with comparing things to the Nazis, or to similar groups, is that they did not start with the camps and warfare. It took time for them to reach the point of being powerful enough to do that and actually going through with it, so it is still possible to make comparisons to them when things aren’t at that extreme, if one is comparing something to how they (or other fascists for that matter) acted before getting to that point.

          • @kewjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Elon and the Twitter company are not anonymous? They’re using their position to actively bury opinions they dislike. by removing a blue check it means less people will see union organizing efforts and messaging.

            The Nazi started deporting after they came into power and again they came into power and held their power by silencing their opposition. Stop being a Corpo fasist apologist.

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        As if they’re not openly making plans to do precisely that to to visibly queer people. Guess we don’t need to worry about the Nazis because they’re doing things in a slightly different order this time around, right?

        • @locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -31 year ago

          That’s a pretty bold allegation. Any proof or are you just slippery sloping the shit out of a blue check mark?

          • twelve20two
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            How about the history of the state of Florida over the last five years

              • @orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                this was answered already, but since you don’t seem to get it the first 5 times, “they” refers to far right actors, such as Musk.

                • @locuester@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I was genuinely confused but now I’ve realized that I stumbled into some polarized red vs blue nonsense that I have no intention of continuing. I don’t make it a habit to group reds and blues together and collectively pin everything on the group.

                  Politics is a sham and arguing red vs blue is actually the problem.

            • @locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              Wait, we jumped from X removing a blue check mark to the far right spouting nonsense? That’s a huge leap

              • @teuast@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Have you heard the things Elon says, or seen the people he signal boosts, or heard of the people and groups he associates with? It’s about as big of a leap as me getting out of bed in the morning, specifically back when I lived in a treehouse and slept on the floor.

                • @locuester@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  No I haven’t. But I definitely know that no one is throwing visibly queer people in work camps in the USA.

                  I’ve since discovered that this is a red vs blue powered issue, which makes this discussion moot. Throwing rocks for any reason at the other color isn’t useful. I vote third party and stay out of red vs blue.

              • @orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                it’s not really a huge leap. Musk is literally part of the group, trying to pull it off.

                • @locuester@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Elon Musk is trying to send visibly queer people to concentration camps? Is there proof of this or is this just some red vs blue nonsense?

        • @aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -41 year ago

          As if they’re not openly making plans to do precisely that to to visibly queer people.

          Who is “they”?

              • @zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Far right isn’t the same as right wing. Right wing could be a liberal. Far right is where you start sorting people by their “worth” instead of letting people discover that for themselves.

                • @aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Far right implies further to the right? How is liberalism which relies on a basic notion of individualism in the same category as ethnonationalism which relies on a basic notion of collectivism?

                • @aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Which is what? Monarchist? Liberal? Fascist? Those three things are described as right-wing sometimes but are all contradictory.

    • @variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Ahemmm just pure “they be crafty”… Like did UAW keep their twitter X account just so they thought “Will Elon be stupid enough to revoke us”. Since it is clear sign of anti-union behavior by CEO of a car company by concrete act and well car company CEO can’t exactly do that with atleast potentially getting in trouble. It won’t suffice alone, but combine it with other actions by Tesla and UAW can argue “Tesla as company all the way to the CEO shows a consistent pattern of anti-union activity of actively hindering our union drives. That is supposed to be illegal”.

      Atleast I think UAW doesn’t mind at all the publicity, this will cause for them “Automaker CEO revoked us, since all business is too conglomerized to too few hands and control way too much of the business”

          • @vivadanang@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Makes sense, electric vehicles have far fewer component assemblies and battery systems will be the most expensive part for ages, UAW wants in on those production lines.

            • @variaatio@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Heck it is say for example straight up the plan in Europe. Since say for example there is no getting away from IG Metal for all German makers. Since IG metal literally covers pretty much whole industrial manufacturing and so on.

              So they just immediately went “IG Metal, workers of the company, now don’t go doing anything rash… we have retraining program planned”.

              Remember this was what Herbet Diess of VW got in trouble in part. Saying to Wolfsburg of “large fraction of you should be just unceremoniously fired, we need more cost efficiency”. Though his main fall was the mismanagement of Cariad and software delay resulting. Which caused the cardinal sin of any big legacy car CEO… Announced launch and delivery dates were not kept. Out he goes unceremoniously.

              I found it funny how some were going “The CEO is talking truth to power, the need to cut workers, don’t you understand”. You don’t do that in place like Germany. You can’t get away from IG Metall. They can make CEO’s life living hell, if “employee-employer” relations are not at least on tolerable stance. Even the comments were from union side of caliber CEO seems to be dumb and doesn’t understand how things are done here in Germany.

              Work force is the main asset. Meaning retrain. Combustion engine labs will be soon instead studying most efficient heat pump setups, most efficient electric motor windings and most importantly Battery pack and cell optimization. The casting plant, that cast and machined engine blocks. Congratulations you are still casting “engine blocks”, only now these new engine blocks are called “electric drive unit housings”. Assembly people are moved from assembled double clutch gearboxes and engine valve trains to assembling electric drive units and battery packs. So on and so on. The gear cutters who cut transmissions, well we still need reduction gearings and say differentials and so on.

                • @variaatio@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I would also add… the part count hasn’t actually dropped overall maybe as much as people might think. Since… seats are parts, head rests are parts, doors are parts, windows are part, body panels are parts, suspension springs are parts. The mechanical drive train part count sure has gone down. There was many many valves and springs in engine and so on. However mostly the overall assembly line is still the same. The final assembly line doesn’t care “are we putting in fuel tank or battery pack”, “is the motor here electric or combustion one”, “oh these fuel lines are electric instead of fluid, well still pretty thick and stiff lines to run, wrangle in there you dastardly high voltage wire as thick as my thumb”.

                  People often forget most of the car… is the car, not it’s drivetrain. Drivetrain is there to move around the car, the cabin. Lot of effort and parts go in the cabin and it is often what sells the car, not the drivetrain. Many a car sale is decided on “hey honey, try these seats, these are really comfortable”. Instead on “is the 0-60 7.2 seconds or 5.3 seconds”. Can you fit the baby stroller in the back boot and so on sells cars. None of that changes, even though the mechanical drive train is completely different.

                  All the upholstery and final assembly department is still exactly same. Except the fuel tank and engine reverse weight. The electric motor weights less than the engine block, but that electric fuel tank sure has gained weight over the empty liquid one.

  • spez
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    Capitalist does captitalist things.

    • @niisyth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Folks used to gather to watch town floggings and hangings. And the Hindenburg image is still known to contemporary folks.

      There’s a schadenfreude in watching disaaters happening in front of your eyes.

    • @NotOverSeether@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      lol, literally schizo posting.

      This article was updated to include information about a Twitter policy to temporarily remove checkmarks from verified accounts that change their profile pictures.

        • @aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -71 year ago

          Only after elected they absorb the union into the state. Before elections the Nazis backed many of the unions.

          • @orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            well no, the Nazis paid lip service to “workers” in general but literally got into bloody (as in armed paramilitary) conflicts with unions (Iron Front vs. SA) for years before the complete takeover of the government, after the takeover of the government almost all union organizers got sent to the concentration camps as political prisoners because “they were all Marxists”, the Nazis then replaced the unions with the German Labor Front (DAF), an organization that existed to keep the worker in his place, going as far as to literally take money from the workers to pay for building new production lines.

            so, no, they did not absorb the unions, and they definitely didn’t back the unions, unless you call strike-breaking with a machine gun “backing”

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              Yes, they had a ton of conflict with the more liberal unions, but they also organized Nazi aligned unions. They were not very successful at recruiting members to them but they tried to. Also, occasionally they cooperated with communist unions.

              the Nazis then replaced the unions with the German Labor Front (DAF)

              Yes, absorption? As in unions used to be allowed to exist as independent entities, then workers were forced to join the state “union”

              unless you call strike-breaking with a machine gun “backing”

              Source on Nazi strike breaking before 1932/3?

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -41 year ago

              No? I don’t generally agree with how a lot of people group the right, the Nazis were a lot closer to the Soviets than they were capitalists. Furthermore, I didn’t say they were pro every Union, I said they supported unions that supported them.

          • @teuast@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            This is blatantly ahistorical and you’d almost have to deliberately keep yourself ignorant to think this.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -21 year ago

              The KPD leadership initially first criticised but then supported the 1931 Prussian Landtag referendum, an unsuccessful attempt launched by the far-right Stahlhelm to bring down the social democrat state government of Prussia by means of a plebiscite; the KPD referred to the SA as “working people’s comrades” during this campaign.

              In November 1932, the KPD and the Nazis worked together in the Berlin transport workers’ strike.

              They had an entire organization for infiltrating unions to try to get support

              The NSBO had overall little success among German organized workers, except in certain regions where they supported strikes, such as the 1932 Berlin transport strike.

              Almost like exactly what I said.

              • @teuast@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                My guy, your source proves my point, not yours, even by your own summary of it. If you were capable of feeling ashamed of yourself, now would be a great time to do so.

        • @orangebussycat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -81 year ago

          No, it’s part of the capitalist agenda and its a good thing. If you don’t want to do your job then quit. That goes for cops, UAW workers, teachers, and more.

          • @teuast@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Union-busting is absolutely part of the fascist agenda.

            No, it’s part of the capitalist agenda

            That’s what they just said.

            and its a good thing.

            If you’re an obscenely wealthy ghoul who profits off the suffering of everyone who has less money than you, then yes. In all other cases, absolutely the fuck not.

            If you don’t want to do your job then quit. That goes for cops, UAW workers, teachers, and more.

            So you’d be happy if all the cops, auto workers, teachers, nurses, firefighters, etc. quit? You’d rather have massive and continuous societal upheaval than workers collectively bargaining for the right to make a decent living doing their jobs? I’d rather have a functioning society, personally, and that’s why I support unions and you should too.

              • @teuast@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Then why does a Big Mac cost almost the same at a unionized McDonald’s in Denmark as it does at a non-unionized one in Tennessee? I mean, I guess anything is possible when you just lie, but a lot of things become a lot clearer once you acknowledge reality.

        • @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Like, unironically. Fascists are extremely anti-union.

          There’s obviously a lot more to it, and this is a relatively minor example even after Elon made paid accounts have more visibility, but this is very much one of their things.

          • @aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            The Nazis and Soviets did the same thing about unions. Picked unions that had a lot of their backers in them and backed those, then once elected they created state ran unions and banned all others.

            • @orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              for the fascist please refer to my previous comment, for the Communists, the Bolsheviks didn’t have much to do with the small and numerous Russian unions (Russia had a very beurocratically decentralized industry at that point in time) and later fought against them as they mostly joined the white Russian faction (the bolsheviks being backed by the Entente), and ironically the term Tankie comes from an event where the soviet unions crushed mainly union uprisings against the soviets in Hungary, with tanks, because the soviets also couldn’t stand unions (like ever fascist ever)

              please stop repeating American Cold War era misinformation.

              • @aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -21 year ago

                the Bolsheviks didn’t have much to do with the small and numerous Russian unions (Russia had a very beurocratically decentralized industry at that point in time) and later fought against them as they mostly joined the white Russian faction

                Source for this? Everything I find contradicts that, but most of those are Marxist sources.

                the bolsheviks being backed by the Entente

                You mean central powers

                and ironically the term Tankie comes from an event where the soviet unions crushed mainly union uprisings against the soviets in Hungary

                I clearly stated they opposed unions not reporting to the state. Also the Hungarian revolution was a bit more than a strike. Both the Nazis and the Soviets constructed unions that were organs of the state.

    • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Eh, that’s super random. My great grandfather died in his 40s from alcoholism related, and my grandfather in like his 80s from alcohol related causes. If my great grandfather drank more than my grandfather on the other side I can’t even imagine how he even survived his 20s or 30s… people used to drink a lot and call it normal

      (Also, random side note. Elon is bizarre to ketamine. He microdoses daily, and takes “regular doses” to be “more social at parties” that doesn’t sound super healthy, but I am not a doctor…)