• AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    14 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Victorian government is forging ahead with plans to demolish three public housing towers subject to a class action seeking to stop the redevelopment.

    The move was described by a lawyer for residents as an example of them being “treated as an afterthought”, after the supreme court ordered the class action could proceed to a two-day trial this month.

    Inner Melbourne Community Legal said it was notified by the Victorian government solicitor’s office that Homes Victoria – the body that oversees social housing in the state – would sign a contract for demolition works to commence “on or after 19 July”.

    Louisa Bassini, the managing lawyer at Inner Melbourne Community Legal, said it was disappointing the government was “steamrolling ahead” with plans to raze the buildings despite the ongoing class action.

    At the time, the supreme court justice Melinda Richards rejected their lawyers’ argument that government and the housing minister, Harriet Shing, should be defendants.

    The court last week ordered the class action could proceed to a two-day trial, to begin on 28 October, after lawyers acting on behalf of the residents reframed their legal argument.


    The original article contains 681 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • maegul (he/they)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    I’m unclear on the issue here. Is it that the total capacity of public housing will be reduced or that residents will be forced out in the interim? Also, what’s the point of these redevelopments? To “modernise” public housing facilities?

    • @AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      124 months ago

      The poors will be decanted out to more socioeconomically appropriate areas further out, and the space they were taking up will be freed up for gentrification.

      • maegul (he/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Ugh. So they’re not replacing the housing with more/better social housing? Cunts.

        • Some social housing if I’m reading it correctly. Even then social housing is usually still privatised housing. So the amount of public housing could well be zilch.