It was a remarkable moment Monday night at the Republican National Convention, surely creating some amount of confusion among longtime Republicans, when Sean O’Brien, president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, delivered a stemwinder of a speech in prime time. He called former President Donald Trump a “tough S.O.B.”

Even the teamsters are showing up.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    92·
    10 months ago

    And Lincoln hated conservatives.

    It’s hilarious that you want me to read “the truth” by a convicted fraudster and conspiracy theorist.

    Also, you didn’t address what I said because you know I’m right and you’re an intellectual coward. So which is it?

    You’re beyond parody.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        101·
        10 months ago

        But you say you are conservative—eminently conservative—while we are revolutionary, destructive, or something of the sort. What is conservatism? Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried? We stick to, contend for, the identical old policy on the point in controversy which was adopted by “our fathers who framed the Government under which we live”; while you with one accord reject, and scout, and spit upon that old policy, and insist upon substituting something new. True, you disagree among yourselves as to what that substitute shall be. You are divided on new propositions and plans, but you are unanimous in rejecting and denouncing the old policy of the fathers. Some of you are for reviving the foreign slave trade; some for a Congressional Slave-Code for the Territories; some for Congress forbidding the Territories to prohibit Slavery within their limits; some for maintaining Slavery in the Territories through the judiciary; some for the “gur-reat pur-rinciple” that “if one man would enslave another, no third man should object”, fantastically called “Popular Sovereignty”; but never a man among you is in favor of federal prohibition of slavery in federal territories, according to the practice of “our fathers who framed the Government under which we live”. Not one of all your various plans can show a precedent or an advocate in the century within which our Government originated. Consider, then, whether your claim of conservatism for yourselves, and your charge of destructiveness against us, are based on the most clear and stable foundations.

        Human action can be modified to some extent, but human nature cannot be changed. There is a judgment and a feeling against slavery in this nation, which cast at least a million and a half of votes. You cannot destroy that judgment and feeling—that sentiment—by breaking up the political organization which rallies around it. You can scarcely scatter and disperse an army which has been formed into order in the face of your heaviest fire; but if you could, how much would you gain by forcing the sentiment which created it out of the peaceful channel of the ballot-box, into some other channel?

        Lincoln at Cooper Union

        Read a goddamn book

          • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
            81·
            10 months ago

            Read the first fucking sentence, genius. He’s referring to slavers who call themselves conservatives.

            Real Westworld moment here.

              • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
                71·
                10 months ago

                Because you know I’m right.

                Lincoln hated conservatives and slavers- one and the same in his time. I gave you a primary source.

                Lincoln is only a “well known conservative” to people who listen to grifters and liars.

                You’ve incapable of refuting the facts laid before you, so you run away like you always do while claiming that you’re correct.

                Conservatism is built on a pile of bullshit.

                  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
                    61·
                    10 months ago

                    Well I just gave you Lincoln’s own speech and you choose to listen to propagandists instead.

                    Could you not understand it?

                    You refuted nothing- you drive-by fired a Wikipedia article at me that you didn’t even read because you’re lazy and haven’t been told how to respond to this because the fake historians you listen to don’t want to mention it.

                    How very postmodern of you to insist on your own reality.