• MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, they interpret it.

      You said they got it wrong and it was a corrupt ruling. I’m curious where you think the law went against what they ruled, in other words, how did they interpret the law ‘corruptly’

            • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I asked you to expand on your wild claim, you couldn’t.

              I was trying to learn your position and potentially go on your side if you had a solid argument. 1 thing you’re right about is me not having an opinion on if the court is corrupt or not, because I don’t have any information saying they’re corrupt. I wanted to learn your argument, but you failed to convince me, and likely anybody else, with you’ve mentioned.