The airline blamed difficulties securing more efficient aircraft and sustainable jet fuel.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18104463

Air New Zealand has abandoned a 2030 goal to cut its carbon emissions, blaming difficulties securing more efficient planes and sustainable jet fuel.

The move makes it the first major carrier to back away from such a climate target.

The airline added it is working on a new short-term target and it remains committed to an industry-wide goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

The aviation industry is estimated to produce around 2% of global carbon dioxide emissions, which airlines have been trying to reduce with measures including replacing older aircraft and using fuel from renewable sources.

  • @deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    1•5 months ago

    So? Buy some more carbon credits or plant some more trees to offset.

    Just dropping the goal entirely makes me think you weren’t really taking it seriously anyway.

    • @absGeekNZ@lemmy.nzOPEnglish
      7•5 months ago

      But carbon credits are essentially bullshit…

      I guess people are a little shocked at the honesty from a corporate.

      • @deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        4•5 months ago

        An imperfect response to a perfect storm.

        Everyone we spoke to is adamant: offsets can never be the total solution or a get-out-of-climate-regulation-free card. But even this may be thinking about it in the wrong way. John Holler, a climate expert at the World Wildlife Fund, who used to work at Verra, says carbon trading isn’t really about offsetting at all. Instead, it’s simply a tool for routing money toward good things: low-carbon stoves, forests, community solar energy. “You’re purchasing carbon credits to contribute to global decarbonization,” he says, “not making a claim against your own emissions.”

        A humbler, less satisfying goal. But perhaps a more honest one.

        You’re letting perfect be the enemy of good.

        Routing money from polluters to anyone willing to try less polluting stuff is still an improvement on doing nothing at all.

        • @Mischala@lemmy.nz
          3•5 months ago

          You make an excellent point. I was merely pointing out it’s not a silver bullet.

          And I believe the goals that Air NZ was targeting were not “net” but actual emission targets. So they cannot simply offset their way out of them.

          Honestly, having them declare failure early is a better outcome than getting to the zero hour and saying “we can’t do it” this means they are actually tracking their progress and taking the promises seriously.

          • @deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
            2•5 months ago

            actually tracking their progress and taking the promises seriously.

            I hadn’t thought of it that way.

            Good point.