• @saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “No, I said P! P for pterodactyl!”

    Edit: Though, that said, the point of the phonetic alphabet is they are very distinguishable words that sound nothing like one another. Even making out just “-a-a” you know it was papa, P. So as long as you know how to spell pterodactyl…

    • @667@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      The NATO phonetic alphabet is incredibly useful, though it does suffer from some issues in similar sounds. During a recent high frequency (HF) worldwide competition (IARU-HF), weak-signal SSB stations sometimes had to spend a few minutes trying to complete a radio exchange because of similar sounding phonetic endings: “Was that whiskey one bravo alpha?”

      “Negative, whiskey one tango alpha—TANGO alpha, over”

      This happens so commonly, that many HF operators substitute other words in the same manner to enhance understanding: common ones are kilowatt, sugar, Germany, America, London, etc.

      • @saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        kilowatt, sugar, Germany, America, London

        They’re great substitutes. I always found Quebec to be the most distinguishable because of geographic reference.

        Golf to Germany makes sense as Golf it’s single syllable with yet another hard type O in it. Unlike Mike which could be missed, but the I and K crack/pop are strong sounds.

        Kilowatt is interesting since the ‘watt’ is a backup sound if kilo is distorted. Honestly, Kardashian would be a good one as much as it pains me to say it.

        • @667@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Kilowatt trips me up still, I’ll copy KW maybe once in ~100 exchanges and not notice. It’s more common during high-volume exchanges. Getting better though!

          I shudder at even typing Kardashian lol