• @tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    That lack of nuance is not helpful. There are plenty of liberals that would like a more balanced economy.

    Edit: I’m tired of everyone’s “that’s not socialism.” You have to get people behind it. That requires taking steps. You aren’t going to bitch at reasonable people online to wake up one day and we’ve made the full conversion.

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      “More balanced” means Capitalism with safety nets, right? That’s not Socialism.

      • @tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 months ago

        Sure but I don’t think we are just going to flip a switch tomorrow and the country will be socialist. You have to start somewhere and get support. When we show people how good it is for the working class, they will push with us.

        • Cowbee [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          04 months ago

          You’re partially correct. You can’t get there via the existing Capitalist system, you have to build up dual power via organizing. The Capitalist system will dangle treats like Carrots but never allow the system itself to change from within.

    • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      A balanced economy is not socialism. Socialism means the democratic control over the economy by the workers. To have democratic control over the economy, workers must control the means of production. You cannot “balance” that with capitalism.