@mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca • 5 months agoPoll shows 84% of PC users unwilling to pay extra for AI-enhanced hardwarevideocardz.commessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up1698arrow-down17cross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1691arrow-down1external-linkPoll shows 84% of PC users unwilling to pay extra for AI-enhanced hardwarevideocardz.com@mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca • 5 months agomessage-square155fedilinkcross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-square@barsquid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•5 months agoDo you have an article on that handy? I like reading about side channel and timing attacks.
minus-square@rtxn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink19•5 months agoTPM-FAIL from 2019. It affects Intel fTPM and some dedicated TPM chips: link The latest (at the moment) UEFI vulnerability, UEFIcanhazbufferoverflow is also related to, but not directly caused by, TPM on Intel systems: link
minus-square@barsquid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•5 months agoThat’s insane. How can they be doing security hardware and leave a timing attack in there? Thank you for those links, really interesting stuff.
Do you have an article on that handy? I like reading about side channel and timing attacks.
TPM-FAIL from 2019. It affects Intel fTPM and some dedicated TPM chips: link
The latest (at the moment) UEFI vulnerability, UEFIcanhazbufferoverflow is also related to, but not directly caused by, TPM on Intel systems: link
That’s insane. How can they be doing security hardware and leave a timing attack in there?
Thank you for those links, really interesting stuff.