• @Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    Bashing denizens who decide to denote their sarcasm is as /stupid as bashing those who don’t. “Oh no, now that the tone has been set the point is ruined!” Gosh, it must suck to be you, I’m genuinely sorry this is the way your brain works.

    • It’s not that the point is ruined. It’s that it’s no longer sarcasm. The whole point of sarcasm is that it seems like the message is genuine. Ironically, using /s makes a statement unsarcastic.

    • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -101 year ago

      Well no, because the /s tag isn’t symmetrical.

      In cases where the /s tag is used instead of sarcasm being interpreted successfully, there’s no mechanism to determine how well bonded and ready for complex communication a group is.

      It’s similar to banter, where one insults one’s friends in good fun. It’s a readiness test. The guy who gets insulted by your banter isn’t ready to communicate at a complex level with you.

      Same for people who can’t figure out when you’re being sarcastic.

      Misinterpretation of sarcasm is a canary in the coal mine, an indicator that complex topics aren’t going to be successfully discussed here, because there’s too much misinterpretation happening.

      • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Sarcasm is incredibly difficult to interpret over text unless you personally know the person doing it. That’s highly unlikely on the Internet, and honestly it’s just an easy thing to do to ensure people that have difficulty interpreting tone through text can be included. To me, bitching about tone indicators is like bitching over subtitles. It’s not meant for you.

      • @boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        oh well. Worse than stupidity, we have here a strayed pedantically breeded nonsensical being.