@yokonzo@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 4 months agoJust kind of makes sense no?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square152fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageJust kind of makes sense no?lemmy.world@yokonzo@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square152fedilink
minus-square@KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.calinkfedilink4•4 months agoHow so? A) Less transmission lines to where it’s needed and b) more qualified/trained staff centralized to the solar installs. I’m not against rural solar by any stretch but I can’t fathom being against urban solar? We need to solar all the things.
minus-square@Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink3•4 months agoIn my post I literally said that solar can be put on top of houses so I’m not sure why you want to argue with me about this. I just think urban areas are better served by homes with solar on top than parking lots with solar on top.
minus-square@KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•4 months agoOkay, reasonable enough, I had read your response as “no solar, just homes and put the solar in rural”.
How so? A) Less transmission lines to where it’s needed and b) more qualified/trained staff centralized to the solar installs.
I’m not against rural solar by any stretch but I can’t fathom being against urban solar? We need to solar all the things.
In my post I literally said that solar can be put on top of houses so I’m not sure why you want to argue with me about this. I just think urban areas are better served by homes with solar on top than parking lots with solar on top.
Okay, reasonable enough, I had read your response as “no solar, just homes and put the solar in rural”.