• @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -214 months ago

    You are weirdly angry that Biden helped a lot of vulnerable people through drug pricing regulation.

    That’s what I’m saying. You’re agreeing with me.

    Some of Biden’s other first-term achievements(listed directly above) have been incredibly helpful to hundreds of millions of people.

    Weird that not eating a shit sandwich is a difficult decision for you, but maybe it explains why you don’t understand the previous comment.

    Biden isn’t a better president compared to dumps, he literally invested more in infrastructure and clean technology and climate change than any other president.

    Biden has made and is still making huge strides in civil rights.

    He’s taxing the wealthy.

    He’s making a lot of progressive strides.

    You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

    • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      204 months ago

      You’re agreeing with me.

      You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

      So why do you think I’m arguing with you?

      • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        -174 months ago

        I don’t.

        You’re agreeing with me that biden is a good president, but incorrect that he’s only a good precedent relative to Trump.

        You’re very confused. Do you have any questions?

        • @ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          74 months ago

          …but you said they’re arguing with you, which is why they asked why you think they’re arguing with you.

          • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            -6
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            What I said is:

            “what do you think you’re arguing about?”

            I didn’t mention myself.

            It’s clear they meant to be arguing something, but if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

            If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

            So, what do they think they’re arguing against?

            • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              64 months ago

              It’s clear they meant to be arguing something

              Right…

              if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

              Keep going…

              If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

              Almost there…