• @lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -3
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Yes, it actually does.

    That’s kind of — you know — the point.

    Your response is like literally finger-in-ear, head-in-sand denial.

    • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You haven’t seen the press eat up every other utterance from Trump’s mouth in the past 8 years? They report on every little thing he does because it creates ratings and clicks.

      • @lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Well now it’s funny because I hear both arguments simultaneously:

        • “Why are we talking about Biden when we SHOULD be talking about Trump!?”

        • “Why is the media giving Trump so much attention!?!?”

        Regardless I’m less concerned about the past because that’s written in stone, and I’m more concerned about the future that is still mutable.

        • @Kiernian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          5 months ago
          • “Why are we talking about Biden when we SHOULD be talking about Trump!?”

          What I mean when I utter something like this is: “why are we laser-focused on a few of Biden’s relatively minor (IN COMPARISON) gaffes/mistakes/issues/flaws when the laundry list of shit that’s bad about Trump is TWO ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE LARGER?”

          If you count up every bad thing Trump has done that would be on looping repeat on fox news for weeks if Biden or Obama said/did it, you’d hit five digits before you got back to Trump talking about grabbing women by the pussy. It’s fucking LUDICROUSLY one-sided. And non-fox stations are not much better. Think about it.

          • "Why is the media giving Trump so much attention!?!

          So much POSITIVE attention.

          • @lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I am in complete agreement with your analysis here. I fully agree there is a double-standard of expectations, and quite frankly has been, for well over 2 decades.

            The question is: what do we do about it?

            I watched every single day of the live coverage of the January 6th Hearings that went on throughout the summer of 2022. I watched the Impeachment hearings. I watched the Charlottesville reactions. I watched all the coverage of the criminal indictments and the criminal conviction. I’ve seen quite a bit on Project 2025 long before Biden’s catastrophic debate. The problem is: truly, nothing is sticking. Why? Because right-wing media largely controls the narrative in this country, both thanks to the injection of billionaire money and corporations, but just the prevalence of unabashed conservative media, ranging from church and AM talk radio to Fox News on in every breakroom and doctor’s office waiting-room in the country. They muddy the waters so effectively that no matter how loudly we point to these problems, they have talking-point to deflect, downplay, or muddy the waters of reality… And uninformed gullible apathetic voters lap that shit up.

            The only thing we can really do is not make it easy for them. We can’t give them an argument that actually has legitimate substance to it, like Biden’s age and cognitive capacity. Look, to me the data is clear: 75% of Americans don’t think Biden is fit to run again, and that Democrats would have better odds at defeating Trump with someone else. I’m in agreement. Every single data point I can find signals Trump sweeping the election. Mostly because the guy who supposedly holds the moral high ground can’t shake his ego and step down for the greater good.

            • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I am in complete agreement with your analysis here. I fully agree there is a double-standard of expectations, and quite frankly has been, for well over 2 decades.

              Good to know you do agree with Lichtman after all.

              • @lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -3
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Now that’s an awfully cute strawman fallacy you’ve got there, buddy, but no that does not mean I buy the premise that asshole is saying in this article.

                Will you listen if I explain why?

                  • @lennybird@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -45 months ago

                    Well considering nothing I said was countered, I win by default. So you better say yes or start mounting a substantive rebuttal.