Neil Gaiman — the best-selling author whose work includes comic book series *The Sandman *and the novels Good Omens and American Gods — has denied sexual assault allegations made against him by two women with whom he had relationships with at the time, Tortoise Media reports.

The allegations were made during Tortoise’s four-part podcast Master: the Allegations Against Neil Gaiman, which was released Wednesday. In it, the women allege “rough and degrading sex” with the author, which the women claim was not always consensual.

One of the women, a 23-year-old named Scarlett, worked as a nanny to his child.

  • AwesomeLowlander
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m all for supporting women. Give them a chance to speak out, make sure they are fairly listened to and taken seriously. You’ve gone a step beyond that, you’ve already decided guilt and innocence and proclaimed it. More, you’re doing so from a position of influence (yes, as a moderator of a large community, that’s what you are). This is the sort of thing that libel charges get filed for (ok, not gonna happen at our current size, but you may want to start keeping that in mind.)

    Why would you default to that?

    Because that’s the basis of our legal bloody system! Innocent until proven guilty! There’s a thousand law professors out there who can explain it better and more eloquently than I could in a thousand years, but that’s the gist of it.

    You do not need a conviction to make up your mind.

    That’s correct. We do, however, need a conviction before stating it as fact instead of opinion.

    Not only are you siding with the party with no evidence

    I beg to differ. I have not sided with any party. What is it about people today that they seem unable to grasp the concept of neutrality?

    • @jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      -46 months ago

      So what you’re saying is, all I need to do to get one of my exes jailed is get to know another disgruntled ex of theirs? Awesome!

      How is that neutrality? If you’re going to troll, do better dude

      • AwesomeLowlander
        link
        fedilink
        66 months ago

        Troll? I was pointing out the issues in your logic. Was the blatant sarcasm not blatant enough for you?