A leading House Democrat is preparing a constitutional amendment in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark immunity ruling, seeking to reverse the decision “and ensure that no president is above the law.”

Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, sent a letter to colleagues informing them of his intent to file the resolution, which would kickstart what’s traditionally a cumbersome amendment process.

“This amendment will do what SCOTUS failed to do — prioritize our democracy,” Morelle said in a statement to AP.

It’s the most significant legislative response yet to the decision this week from the court’s conservative majority, which stunned Washington and drew a sharp dissent from the court’s liberal justices warning of the perils to democracy, particularly as Trump seeks a return to the White House. Still, the effort stands almost no chance of succeeding in this Congress.

    • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The average American has zero clue how anything in the government works, nor the interest in policy to actually understand what the policies their politician of choice are pushing do. The average American is so disconnected from politics it’s zero surprise that shitty politicians are elected everywhere regularly.

      This isn’t an indictment of the people themselves but the society they live in that somehow incientivizes general laziness when it comes to civics

      • The republikkklowns have really simplified it though.They STAND for removing human rights, racism, facism and against anything good for the people. At this point you have two choices. Democracy or Dictatorship. I’ll take human rights and Democracy please.

        • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          My point was that the average American is simply too disconnected from politics to see this. The average voter is terrifyingly uninformed

    • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      That doesnt take care of it, nor can voters take care of it.

      Even if Biden gets re-elected, this ruling stays in play perpetually until someone undoes it, which requires the supreme court justices to walk it back after a period of time.

      The only option is to use the newly granted powers themself to undo the granted powers.

      It’s, imo, the only play.

      Also this has nothing to do with being a “petulant child”, it proves the point of how the granted powers are over-reaching.

      If they werent over-reaching, then he wouldnt be able to use them to do this. It becomes a forced move on the justices behalf.

      They either:

      a. Accept the powers are to overpowered and in turn are forced to, through the command itself, have to roll it back or b. Rule that Biden cant do that, which forces cementing an upper limit on what the powers can do (it establishes a baseline that you cant just use the powers to force supreme justice acts and/or to order people to die)

      Either way, it either neuters the powers to some extent or completely nullifies them.